SOURCE: Interfax-Ukraine
A poll on the attitude of Ukrainians to New Year holidays was conducted by the Razumkov center's sociological service in December 2011
According to the poll, 92.5% Ukrainians will celebrate Eastern Orthodox Christmas using the older Julian calendar, while 61.3% of respondents will celebrate New Year using the older Julian calendar. 10.3% of those polled planned to celebrate Orthodox Christmas on the Gregorian calendar, while 49% of respondents consider it a holiday too.
Western region residents traditionally celebrate the New Year holiday more rarely than the average figure for the country (85.1%), while they celebrate Christmas (97.4%) and New Year holiday (77.6%) on the Julian calendar more often than on average in the country.
People aged over 60 (82.7%) celebrate the New Year holiday more rarely. The younger the respondents the more often they celebrate New Year using the older Julian calendar.
The poll was conducted by Razumkov center from December 9 to December 16, 2011. A total of 2,008 respondents aged over 18 from all of the regions of Ukraine, Kyiv city and Crimea were interviewed. Respondents from 131 towns and settlements were polled, including 79 towns and 52 rural settlements. The poll's margin of error is 2.3%.
Saturday, December 31, 2011
Friday, December 30, 2011
Metropolitan Jonah to speak at DC "March for Life" January 23
SOURCE: OCA WEBSITE
Orthodox Christians everywhere — especially those within driving distance of the US capital — are encouraged to bear witness to their faith at the annual March for Life Monday, January 23, 2012.
As in years past, His Beatitude, Metropolitan Jonah, will speak at the pre-March program and offer prayers for the victims of abortion at the conclusion of the March. He will also attend the annual Rose Dinner.
Other members of the Orthodox Church in America’s Holy Synod of Bishops also are expected to attend.
Marchers are asked to gather at noon under the “Orthodox Christians for Life” banner on the National Mall, west of Eighth Street near the Smithsonian Castle. After the rally, marchers will procede up Constitution Avenue to the US Supreme Court, where a Memorial will be celebrated for the victims of abortion.
While additional details concerning the the Orthodox Christian witness at the March will be posted as received, general information on the March may be found at the March For Life’s website.
Orthodox Christians everywhere — especially those within driving distance of the US capital — are encouraged to bear witness to their faith at the annual March for Life Monday, January 23, 2012.
![]() |
| Metropolitan Jonah |
Other members of the Orthodox Church in America’s Holy Synod of Bishops also are expected to attend.
Marchers are asked to gather at noon under the “Orthodox Christians for Life” banner on the National Mall, west of Eighth Street near the Smithsonian Castle. After the rally, marchers will procede up Constitution Avenue to the US Supreme Court, where a Memorial will be celebrated for the victims of abortion.
While additional details concerning the the Orthodox Christian witness at the March will be posted as received, general information on the March may be found at the March For Life’s website.
Documents show how Pope tried to end Irish inmates' 1981 hunger strike
By Michael Kelly
SOURCE: Catholic News Service
DUBLIN (CNS) -- Declassified British documents reveal the extent to which Pope John Paul II tried unsuccessfully to intervene to end a 1981 hunger strike by Catholic prisoners in a British jail in Northern Ireland.
The documents claim that, after the pope sent a special envoy, the leader of the Provisional Irish Republican Army prisoners, Bobby Sands, was willing to suspend the fast just days before he died.
The offer was conveyed to the British authorities by the pope's secretary, Irish Msgr. John Magee, whom Pope John Paul dispatched to persuade the prisoners to call off the hunger strike.
The state papers, declassified under the 30-year-rule, claim that Sands told Msgr. Magee, who later became the bishop of Cloyne, that he would suspend his strike in return for discussions with a British government official, two priests and three other prisoners as witnesses.
However, the British rejected the offer, claiming it was an attempt to open negotiations. The prisoners, incarcerated for paramilitary activity against British rule in Northern Ireland, had begun their hunger strike in a bid to be reclassified as political prisoners, a move Britain vehemently rejected.
Sands died May 5, 1981, after 66 days on hunger strike; he was buried with a crucifix that Msgr. Magee had given him as a gift from Pope John Paul. Ten prisoners starved themselves to death before a compromise was reached that October.
The hunger strike significantly polarized tensions between the majority-Protestant and minority-Catholic communities in Northern Ireland. More than 100,000 Catholics attended Sands' funeral, and Sinn Fein, the political wing of the Irish Republican Army, began contesting elections for the first time.
Most Northern Irish Catholics want Britain to cede the region to the Irish Republic to form a single independent Ireland, while most Protestants support the region's continuation in the United Kingdom. A 1998 peace accord committed all sides to pursue their goals by purely peaceful means. As a result, Northern Ireland remains part of the United Kingdom but is governed by a cross-community power-sharing government based in Belfast, Northern Ireland.
The declassified papers also reveal that Irish Prime Minister Garret FitzGerald appealed to Cardinal Tomas O Fiaich in 1981 for a change in the Catholic Church's approach to interchurch marriages.
At the time, children of interchurch marriages were required to be raised Catholic.
But FitzGerald said he believed a change would aid peace and reconciliation in Northern Ireland. He wrote the cardinal that the government wanted to "indicate concern" and "raise the possibility" that the Vatican "might not perhaps be disposed to take special account of the Irish situation if invited to do so."
"I trust that Your Eminence will appreciate and understand the motives that have led me to write to you at this time in these terms, in full recognition of the separation of church and state," he added.
Soon after, the Irish bishops decided to postpone publication of a revised directory on mixed marriages. After a meeting with British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in November 1981, FitzGerald described the bishops' postponement as "significant."
The new directory issued in November 1983 retained the promise by the Catholic partner to raise the children Catholic, but stressed that parents had joint responsibility for the religious upbringing of their children.
SOURCE: Catholic News Service
DUBLIN (CNS) -- Declassified British documents reveal the extent to which Pope John Paul II tried unsuccessfully to intervene to end a 1981 hunger strike by Catholic prisoners in a British jail in Northern Ireland.
![]() |
| Bobby Sands Mural of the Falls Road, Belfast |
The offer was conveyed to the British authorities by the pope's secretary, Irish Msgr. John Magee, whom Pope John Paul dispatched to persuade the prisoners to call off the hunger strike.
The state papers, declassified under the 30-year-rule, claim that Sands told Msgr. Magee, who later became the bishop of Cloyne, that he would suspend his strike in return for discussions with a British government official, two priests and three other prisoners as witnesses.
However, the British rejected the offer, claiming it was an attempt to open negotiations. The prisoners, incarcerated for paramilitary activity against British rule in Northern Ireland, had begun their hunger strike in a bid to be reclassified as political prisoners, a move Britain vehemently rejected.
Sands died May 5, 1981, after 66 days on hunger strike; he was buried with a crucifix that Msgr. Magee had given him as a gift from Pope John Paul. Ten prisoners starved themselves to death before a compromise was reached that October.
The hunger strike significantly polarized tensions between the majority-Protestant and minority-Catholic communities in Northern Ireland. More than 100,000 Catholics attended Sands' funeral, and Sinn Fein, the political wing of the Irish Republican Army, began contesting elections for the first time.
![]() |
| The funeral of Bobby Sands |
The declassified papers also reveal that Irish Prime Minister Garret FitzGerald appealed to Cardinal Tomas O Fiaich in 1981 for a change in the Catholic Church's approach to interchurch marriages.
At the time, children of interchurch marriages were required to be raised Catholic.
But FitzGerald said he believed a change would aid peace and reconciliation in Northern Ireland. He wrote the cardinal that the government wanted to "indicate concern" and "raise the possibility" that the Vatican "might not perhaps be disposed to take special account of the Irish situation if invited to do so."
"I trust that Your Eminence will appreciate and understand the motives that have led me to write to you at this time in these terms, in full recognition of the separation of church and state," he added.
Soon after, the Irish bishops decided to postpone publication of a revised directory on mixed marriages. After a meeting with British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in November 1981, FitzGerald described the bishops' postponement as "significant."
The new directory issued in November 1983 retained the promise by the Catholic partner to raise the children Catholic, but stressed that parents had joint responsibility for the religious upbringing of their children.
Greek Abbot Arrested for Role in Financial Scandal (and Why is Russia So Interested?)
SOURCE: Religious Dispatches
In a relatively unprecedented move, Greek police arrested the Rector of the thousand-year-old Vathipedi Monastery, Father Ephraim, on Christmas Eve. He had just returned to the Monastery, which is located on the most sacred ground in all of Orthodox Christendom, which we have now discovered to be the only semi-autonomous region of Mount Athos.
Father Ephraim was arraigned in Athens two days ago. It is hard to say just what this is all about, but the timing is, to put it mildly, dramatic.
The scandal started two years ago, when the revelation of some very sketchy land deals brokered by this same Monastery rocked the Greek government. These business-savvy monks had traded some relatively worthless land by a lake in north-central Greece, land that had been ceded to them by a Byzantine emperor centuries before, for extensive real estate holdings in Athens, costing the Greek government (and the taxpayers) an estimated $130 million or more.
It was unclear how the thing had been arranged, but the scandal led to the defeat of the ruling conservative coalition of the New Democracy in late 2009. This scandal was then folded into the story of the then-emerging Greek economic free-fall by Vanity Fair in the fall of 2010 [see here for RD's earlier coverage -Eds] .
A great deal that has happened since then: revelations of staggering Greek debt early in the new year; grinding new austerity measures imposed by Europe in the summer; a threatened Greek default in October; the inexplicable decision by the Greek Prime Minister George Panadreiou to call for a nationwide referendum on a deal immediately after the Europeans had hammered it out, thereby enabling the Greeks to pay off their debt to French and German banks at fifty cents on the euro. The shock of this unexpected proposal caused Papandreiou’s almost immediate resignation, and the austerity measures he was forced to impose are almost sure to bring down the left-center coalition of PASOK in the next Greek elections.
But there are other details brewing here, some of which we have also reported at RD, and all of which make this recent arrest seem far more interesting, and suspicious. Prime Minister Papandreiou made a trip to Mount Athos himself in October, shortly before his fatal referendum call, in order to have a private meeting with the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople.
Meanwhile, Father Ephraim was preparing for a trip to Russia, nominally to take one of the treasures of the Vathopedi Monastery, the Saint Mary Belt, on a tour of that reemergingly Orthodox country. But this remarkably well-connected Abbot had several meetings with Vladimir Putin as well.
Father Ephraim returned to the Monastery, and was promptly arrested, inspiring sympathetic demonstrations by religious supporters in Greece, and cries of outrage among his political allies in Russia.
It is too early to say what all of this will means, but the astonishing complicity of a religious institution—and a monastery, no less—in real estate wheeling-dealing and international politics is intriguing.
And to be sure, Father Ephraim was not working alone. He made his deals with government officials in Greece, officials who are currently positioning themselves to take back the position they lost two years ago when this story first came to light. It appears as if they may be trying to inoculate themselves against further scandal before they resume power, by putting a priest on ice.
It is obvious that the most visible religious institutions—from the Vatican, to Mount Athos, to the Southern Baptist Convention—are enormous bureaucracies virtually swimming in cash. Their relative immunity from taxation and the normal rules of fiscal oversight are troubling. But this case is especially jarring for the contrast it draws out between the grinding poverty of the Greek people under their new program of enforced austerity and the immeasurable wealth of the Orthodox Church. The same contrast will be drawn out in coming months in Rome, and I dare say in the U.S. as well.
The very public arrest of Catholic priests in Belgium or the U.S. for sexual crimes is one thing; the revelation of the Greek (or Roman) Church’s complicity in white-collar theft, pork-barrel politicking and a form of nepotism whose sole purpose has been to line the clerical elites’ own pockets is something else again.
This is a story we should follow closely.
Why is Russia So Interested?
SOURCE: H KAΘHMEPINH
By Costas Iordanidis
Because justice is independent, its servants do not bow to the pressure of the political leadership; and because institutions must be respected, especially during these times of chaos and turmoil, there is nothing to discuss about the decision to remand the head monk of Vatopedi Monastery, Ephraim, on Christmas Eve. That is what the council of appeals court judges ruled and that is what it did.
It was a pleasant surprise, however, to see how fast and effectively the state authorities acted on the council’s decision. Maybe it is an indication of an unexpected regrouping of state services, which have been strongly criticized for being completely ineffectual in carrying out a plethora of other decisions.
What is most interesting, on a vital and broad level, is the fact that the arrest of Ephraim provoked such an immediate and terse reaction from Moscow, first from the Russian Orthodox Church and then from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The reason is that Russia is eager to take on a leading role on Mount Athos and not because of Ephraim himself.
Some will argue that the Russian reaction -- ecclesiastical and political -- is the result of Ephraim’s initiative to display in Moscow the Holy Belt of the Virgin Mary on the eve of general elections in Russia. It would, however, be a mistake to see the Russian reaction as merely opportunistic.
In the early 1980s, under the omnipotent Leonid Brezhnev, the newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda -- the political arm of the Soviet youth wing -- published an article stating the strong interest of the Communist regime in the “cultural heritage of the USSR” that specifically mentioned Mount Athos and the Holy Lands. Later, Vladimir Putin, as president of Russia, confirmed this interest during a visit to the monastic community.
So, while the Russian interest is clear, the silence of Ecumenical Patriarch Vartholomaios did come as a surprise, given how often he likes to confirm his spiritual authority over the Greek Church and, of course, Mount Athos. The issue, of course, is not over whether Vartholomaios should support or condemn Ephraim, but that an issue that is so critical to Mount Athos is met with silence.
Why the government does not want to take a position on a judicial order is perfectly clear. Yet the arrest of Ephraim and the speed with which the warrant was executed shows, in contrast, the unacceptable negligence and tolerance displayed for the members of a very elite club of well-known figures who have been clearly condemned for crimes of an economic nature in the minds of the citizens.
In a relatively unprecedented move, Greek police arrested the Rector of the thousand-year-old Vathipedi Monastery, Father Ephraim, on Christmas Eve. He had just returned to the Monastery, which is located on the most sacred ground in all of Orthodox Christendom, which we have now discovered to be the only semi-autonomous region of Mount Athos.
Father Ephraim was arraigned in Athens two days ago. It is hard to say just what this is all about, but the timing is, to put it mildly, dramatic.
![]() |
| Prime Minister George Papandreou met with Patriarch Vartholomaios Mt. Athos on October 8 |
It was unclear how the thing had been arranged, but the scandal led to the defeat of the ruling conservative coalition of the New Democracy in late 2009. This scandal was then folded into the story of the then-emerging Greek economic free-fall by Vanity Fair in the fall of 2010 [see here for RD's earlier coverage -Eds] .
A great deal that has happened since then: revelations of staggering Greek debt early in the new year; grinding new austerity measures imposed by Europe in the summer; a threatened Greek default in October; the inexplicable decision by the Greek Prime Minister George Panadreiou to call for a nationwide referendum on a deal immediately after the Europeans had hammered it out, thereby enabling the Greeks to pay off their debt to French and German banks at fifty cents on the euro. The shock of this unexpected proposal caused Papandreiou’s almost immediate resignation, and the austerity measures he was forced to impose are almost sure to bring down the left-center coalition of PASOK in the next Greek elections.
But there are other details brewing here, some of which we have also reported at RD, and all of which make this recent arrest seem far more interesting, and suspicious. Prime Minister Papandreiou made a trip to Mount Athos himself in October, shortly before his fatal referendum call, in order to have a private meeting with the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople.
![]() |
| Archimandrite Ephrem recently travelled to Russia to accompany the Belt of the Most Holy Mother of God, which is kept at Vatopedi Monastery |
Father Ephraim returned to the Monastery, and was promptly arrested, inspiring sympathetic demonstrations by religious supporters in Greece, and cries of outrage among his political allies in Russia.
It is too early to say what all of this will means, but the astonishing complicity of a religious institution—and a monastery, no less—in real estate wheeling-dealing and international politics is intriguing.
And to be sure, Father Ephraim was not working alone. He made his deals with government officials in Greece, officials who are currently positioning themselves to take back the position they lost two years ago when this story first came to light. It appears as if they may be trying to inoculate themselves against further scandal before they resume power, by putting a priest on ice.
It is obvious that the most visible religious institutions—from the Vatican, to Mount Athos, to the Southern Baptist Convention—are enormous bureaucracies virtually swimming in cash. Their relative immunity from taxation and the normal rules of fiscal oversight are troubling. But this case is especially jarring for the contrast it draws out between the grinding poverty of the Greek people under their new program of enforced austerity and the immeasurable wealth of the Orthodox Church. The same contrast will be drawn out in coming months in Rome, and I dare say in the U.S. as well.
The very public arrest of Catholic priests in Belgium or the U.S. for sexual crimes is one thing; the revelation of the Greek (or Roman) Church’s complicity in white-collar theft, pork-barrel politicking and a form of nepotism whose sole purpose has been to line the clerical elites’ own pockets is something else again.
This is a story we should follow closely.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Why is Russia So Interested?
SOURCE: H KAΘHMEPINH
By Costas Iordanidis
Because justice is independent, its servants do not bow to the pressure of the political leadership; and because institutions must be respected, especially during these times of chaos and turmoil, there is nothing to discuss about the decision to remand the head monk of Vatopedi Monastery, Ephraim, on Christmas Eve. That is what the council of appeals court judges ruled and that is what it did.
![]() |
| Ephraim asked for Russia's support and assistance during Greece's economic difficulties on his recent visit to Russia |
What is most interesting, on a vital and broad level, is the fact that the arrest of Ephraim provoked such an immediate and terse reaction from Moscow, first from the Russian Orthodox Church and then from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The reason is that Russia is eager to take on a leading role on Mount Athos and not because of Ephraim himself.
Some will argue that the Russian reaction -- ecclesiastical and political -- is the result of Ephraim’s initiative to display in Moscow the Holy Belt of the Virgin Mary on the eve of general elections in Russia. It would, however, be a mistake to see the Russian reaction as merely opportunistic.
In the early 1980s, under the omnipotent Leonid Brezhnev, the newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda -- the political arm of the Soviet youth wing -- published an article stating the strong interest of the Communist regime in the “cultural heritage of the USSR” that specifically mentioned Mount Athos and the Holy Lands. Later, Vladimir Putin, as president of Russia, confirmed this interest during a visit to the monastic community.
So, while the Russian interest is clear, the silence of Ecumenical Patriarch Vartholomaios did come as a surprise, given how often he likes to confirm his spiritual authority over the Greek Church and, of course, Mount Athos. The issue, of course, is not over whether Vartholomaios should support or condemn Ephraim, but that an issue that is so critical to Mount Athos is met with silence.
Why the government does not want to take a position on a judicial order is perfectly clear. Yet the arrest of Ephraim and the speed with which the warrant was executed shows, in contrast, the unacceptable negligence and tolerance displayed for the members of a very elite club of well-known figures who have been clearly condemned for crimes of an economic nature in the minds of the citizens.
Orthodox Prayer Book for iPhone and Android
A new application "Orthodox Prayer Book" for the iPhone and Android was recent;y released.
It is available in the AppStore and Android Market (keyword Orthodox prayer book) and is completely free. In Russian and Old Church Slavonic languages
Currently available for download and use both versions of the application:
1. For Android: https://market.android.com/details?id=com.onair.prayerbook
2. For iPhone http://itunes.apple.com/ru/app//id490601793
The new application was developedwith the participation of the portal Pravoslavie.Ru.
It is available in the AppStore and Android Market (keyword Orthodox prayer book) and is completely free. In Russian and Old Church Slavonic languages
![]() |
| iTunes screenshot |
Currently available for download and use both versions of the application:
1. For Android: https://market.android.com/details?id=com.onair.prayerbook
2. For iPhone http://itunes.apple.com/ru/app//id490601793
The new application was developedwith the participation of the portal Pravoslavie.Ru.
Thursday, December 29, 2011
ROC "Unhappy" About Good Relations Between UGCC and UOC-KP
SOURCE: RISU
Representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church are concerned over the statements of Patriarch Sviatoslav (Shevchuk) that believers of the Kyivan Patriarchate are “the main Orthodox brethren” of the Ukrainian Greek Catholics.
So reported to UNIAN-Religion the head of the Department of External Church Relations of the Russian Orthodox Church, Metropolitan Ilarion (Alfeiev) of Volokolamsk.
“We cannot remain indifferent to the statements of the new Head of UGCC that the believers of the Kyivan Patriarchate are “the main Orthodox brethren” of the Ukrainian Greek Catholics. The close contacts and even concelebration of Archbishop Sviatoslav (Shevchuk) with representatives of that schismatic structure unrecognized by any Orthodox Church, unfortunately, are an indication of ignoring of the official position of the Moscow Patriarchate and disrespect for the canonical rules of the Orthodox Church,” stressed Metropolitan Ilarion.
“I am deeply convinced that we cannot reach real mutual understanding and reconciliation between our Churches without mutual respect, in particular, in the area of the canonical system,” said Metropolitan Ilarion.
He told the correspondent that the Russian Church receives reports “about acts of proselytism of Greek Catholics among the Orthodox in the territories of the Central and Eastern Ukraine.” “Such phenomena can only strengthen the existing problems in the inter-Church relations while we would like the words about readiness for the dialogue not to conflict with the real actions,” said the metropolitan.
Metropolitan of Volokolamsk said that after the election of Patriarch Sviatoslav, official contacts were actually for the first time established between the Greek Catholics and Orthodox of the Moscow Patriarchate.
“Subsequent statements of Archbishop Sviatoslav about his will to promote settlement of the existing problems between the Moscow Patriarchate and UGCC also inspired us with some optimism,” he said.
Metropolitan Ilarion commented on the recent statement of Patriarch Kirill about the “improvement of the relations between the Orthodox and Greek Catholics in Ukraine.” According to him the patriarch’s words do not mean that all the problems in the relations are already regulated. “The questions of construction of the Orthodox churches in the western Ukraine remain unsettled. Representatives of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church express concern about the mission of Greek Catholics in the eastern Ukraine,” said the metropolitan.
Representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church are concerned over the statements of Patriarch Sviatoslav (Shevchuk) that believers of the Kyivan Patriarchate are “the main Orthodox brethren” of the Ukrainian Greek Catholics.
![]() |
| Metropolitan Ilarion |
“We cannot remain indifferent to the statements of the new Head of UGCC that the believers of the Kyivan Patriarchate are “the main Orthodox brethren” of the Ukrainian Greek Catholics. The close contacts and even concelebration of Archbishop Sviatoslav (Shevchuk) with representatives of that schismatic structure unrecognized by any Orthodox Church, unfortunately, are an indication of ignoring of the official position of the Moscow Patriarchate and disrespect for the canonical rules of the Orthodox Church,” stressed Metropolitan Ilarion.
“I am deeply convinced that we cannot reach real mutual understanding and reconciliation between our Churches without mutual respect, in particular, in the area of the canonical system,” said Metropolitan Ilarion.
He told the correspondent that the Russian Church receives reports “about acts of proselytism of Greek Catholics among the Orthodox in the territories of the Central and Eastern Ukraine.” “Such phenomena can only strengthen the existing problems in the inter-Church relations while we would like the words about readiness for the dialogue not to conflict with the real actions,” said the metropolitan.
Metropolitan of Volokolamsk said that after the election of Patriarch Sviatoslav, official contacts were actually for the first time established between the Greek Catholics and Orthodox of the Moscow Patriarchate.
“Subsequent statements of Archbishop Sviatoslav about his will to promote settlement of the existing problems between the Moscow Patriarchate and UGCC also inspired us with some optimism,” he said.
Metropolitan Ilarion commented on the recent statement of Patriarch Kirill about the “improvement of the relations between the Orthodox and Greek Catholics in Ukraine.” According to him the patriarch’s words do not mean that all the problems in the relations are already regulated. “The questions of construction of the Orthodox churches in the western Ukraine remain unsettled. Representatives of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church express concern about the mission of Greek Catholics in the eastern Ukraine,” said the metropolitan.
Texas, Alabama, Arizona groups ignore threats from Wisconsin atheists
Thousands of Texans, including the state attorney general and the governor, presidential hopeful Rick Perry, have sent a clear message to Wisconsin atheists who enjoy intimidating small towns into removing nativity scenes.
The message is the same from an American Legion post in Montana, a city council in Pennsylvania and a federal judge in Arizona: Go home!
At least 5,000 Texans showed up at a pre-Christmas rally supporting Henderson County officials who have refused to comply with the group’s demand that they remove a nativity scene from the Athens, Texas, courthouse lawn.
Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott said that if the Wisconsin atheists sue as threatened, his office would come to the county’s defense. Texas’ governor, Rick Perry, also said he would intervene to support the county, reported the San Antonio Express-News.
The governor’s office “strongly supports the right of Henderson County to display a Christmas Nativity scene on public property,” said Lucy Nashed, deputy press secretary for Perry’s office. “We have fought the Freedom from Religion Foundation before and won. Our founding principles give citizens freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. Faith and freedom helped build this nation, and faith cannot and should not be removed from public life.”
Read more at Source: beliefNet
The message is the same from an American Legion post in Montana, a city council in Pennsylvania and a federal judge in Arizona: Go home!
At least 5,000 Texans showed up at a pre-Christmas rally supporting Henderson County officials who have refused to comply with the group’s demand that they remove a nativity scene from the Athens, Texas, courthouse lawn.
Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott said that if the Wisconsin atheists sue as threatened, his office would come to the county’s defense. Texas’ governor, Rick Perry, also said he would intervene to support the county, reported the San Antonio Express-News.
The governor’s office “strongly supports the right of Henderson County to display a Christmas Nativity scene on public property,” said Lucy Nashed, deputy press secretary for Perry’s office. “We have fought the Freedom from Religion Foundation before and won. Our founding principles give citizens freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. Faith and freedom helped build this nation, and faith cannot and should not be removed from public life.”
Read more at Source: beliefNet
Photo of the Day: UGCC Pilgrimage to St. Peter's Tomb
![]() |
| On December 26, the second day of Christmas according to the new calendar, a pilgrimage from all over Italy was held to St Peter’s tomb in the Vatican.The celebration in St. Peter’s Basilica in the Vatican began with a Divine Liturgy, headed by Bishop Dionysiy (Liakhovych), Apostolic Visitator for Ukrainian Greek Catholics in Italy and Spain, in concelebration with Archbishop Domenico Calcagno, president of the Administration of the Patrimony of the Apostolic See; Fr. Marko Yaroslav Semehen, pastoral coordinator for Ukrainians in Italy; Monsignor Yaroslav Karpiak, a worker of the Congregation for the Oriental Churches; Fr. Ivan Kulik, administrator of the Ukrainian personal parish in Rome, and others from different parts Italy. SOURCE: Website UGCC |
VIDEO: Ruthenian Divine Liturgy in Rome's Collegium Russicum (Руссікум)
Літургія - Рим - храм св. Антонія (Руссікум)
У середу, 14 грудня 2011р., паломники з Мукачівської греко-католицької єпархії взяли участь у Архієрейській Літургії, очоленій владикою Міланом у храмі св. Антонія при колегії Руссікум, де виховувався і був рукоположений 75 років тому у священики блаженний Теодор.
Pilgrims from the Eparchy of Mukachevo, led by Bishop Milan, celebrated the Divine Liturgy at the Pontifical Russian College in Rome. It was here where Blessed Theodore (Romhza) studied theology and was ordained a Greek Catholic priest. In the Eparchy of Mukachevo this year is dedicated to the memory of Blessed Theodore.
У середу, 14 грудня 2011р., паломники з Мукачівської греко-католицької єпархії взяли участь у Архієрейській Літургії, очоленій владикою Міланом у храмі св. Антонія при колегії Руссікум, де виховувався і був рукоположений 75 років тому у священики блаженний Теодор.
Pilgrims from the Eparchy of Mukachevo, led by Bishop Milan, celebrated the Divine Liturgy at the Pontifical Russian College in Rome. It was here where Blessed Theodore (Romhza) studied theology and was ordained a Greek Catholic priest. In the Eparchy of Mukachevo this year is dedicated to the memory of Blessed Theodore.
Wednesday, December 28, 2011
His Beatitude Lubomyr (Husar) on "How to be Rich"
His Beatitude Liubomyr speaks on money and charity
Interviewed by Nadia TYSIACHNA, SOURCE: The Day
The conversation about material wealth with His Beatitude Liubomyr (HUZAR), former head of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church clearly suggested itself. Archbishop Emeritus [one already retired. – Ed.] has recently presented his second audio book Suspilstvo i Biznes (Society and Business) from the second trilogy Suspilstvo (Society). The first CDs had the title Try Dorohy (Three Ways), where, in fact, the author spoke about way to one’s own self, one’s neighbor, and to God. We think that the suggested issue has not yet been developed well. People more often speak about spiritual wealth. Besides, His Beatitude Liubomyr is not by chance called a sage of modern time – he can speak in a simple way about complicated matters.
“In the Gospel it says the words of Jesus Christ about that it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God,” began His Beatitude Liubomyr HUZAR. “This brings you to an absolutely logical question: is it a sin to live in prosperity? No, of course, not. Wealth in itself is not something bad. The only problem is that wealthy people, as a rule, feel so self-sufficient that they do not need God. In the new audio book I emphasize the statement that one has to know how to be rich! For example, those people could help orphans or sick people, or support culture. After all, they could create jobs by opening their own business. There is a great number of possible options.
“Unfortunately, there are many people (not only in Ukraine) who don’t know how to use their wealth properly. Thus, many of our got-rich-quick men, so called new Ukrainians, don’t know what to do with their property. They want to show off to others that they are some important people. In order to do so they build themselves a few stored mansions, drive luxury vehicles, and even fly on private airplanes… However, most of them stay shallow and often unhappy deep inside. Because, a truly rich person is rich not only with property but is also rich in spirit. Such person is aware of that his wealth is a God’s gift. Besides, it is not the beginning of everything. Thus, for such a person other people are on the first place and he is able to treat them with respect.
“I remember, when I was a student I had a part-time job in a hotel in a resort area. My responsibilities included meeting people, when they checked in. There were different people there: millionaires, who, when asked to wait, did it patiently; middle-class representatives, who also showed politeness in unexpected situations; and got-rich-quick men, who would sniff just as they entered the hotel showing that they didn’t like a thing about it – in one word, they acted out of line and you could tell right away who they were. Obviously, a truly wealthy person, especially those from wealthy families, unlike the ones who acquired their wealth just recently, is of high culture.
“Maybe children of our got-rich-quick men could become truly wealthy people – in soul, spirit, and money. Of course, if they will keep that legacy.”
“It is the same here. Especially, if a person has a gift for that. Not everyone is able to get rich in an honest way.“We forget that in a normal society there have to be rich people.
“However, there exists a problem. Modern TV strongly propagates as an ideal a young, healthy, rich person, who can do whatever he pleases. Let’s say an ordinary boy or girl watches a TV program of such kind and thinks: ‘How great it would be to have lots of money!’ Instead, they’d better encouraged young people to develop their talents, study one or two professions, and become competitive specialists.”
“When someone wants sincerely to make a donation, I would gladly tell about the possibilities: Patriarchal Cathedral, other churches and monasteries, Ukrainian Catholic University, orphanages, hospitals, nursing homes… Then the person can make his choice. If the person asks to guide him saying that I know better who feels greater need at the moment, I do it. But if I realize that this person wants to bribe me, I immediately deny.
“I will frankly tell you that I have never accepted gifts for myself. What do I need? I have roof above my head and my plate is not empty. Ok, I need to buy medicine regularly, but, thank God, I have enough money for that. Do I want something bigger to show off to others: ‘Look, I keep serious money on my account in a bank.’ Do you think I’ll be able to take it with me when I die? This is my philosophy.”
“For some reason we think that we show mercy when we help those in need: sick, homeless, and hungry people. There is no doubt that we should help them. However, I think that each of us needs mercy. That is why let’s try to respect one another, say nice things to each other, and love each other… In one word, let’s be humane.
“Recently, within the framework of social days held by our church I have visited Cherkasy. Answering questions there I suggested the following recipe: ‘Every night dwell on what has God done for you today and then think about what you have done for others.’ This will be a wonderful observance of the fasting and not only fasting.”
Interviewed by Nadia TYSIACHNA, SOURCE: The Day
The conversation about material wealth with His Beatitude Liubomyr (HUZAR), former head of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church clearly suggested itself. Archbishop Emeritus [one already retired. – Ed.] has recently presented his second audio book Suspilstvo i Biznes (Society and Business) from the second trilogy Suspilstvo (Society). The first CDs had the title Try Dorohy (Three Ways), where, in fact, the author spoke about way to one’s own self, one’s neighbor, and to God. We think that the suggested issue has not yet been developed well. People more often speak about spiritual wealth. Besides, His Beatitude Liubomyr is not by chance called a sage of modern time – he can speak in a simple way about complicated matters.
“In the Gospel it says the words of Jesus Christ about that it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God,” began His Beatitude Liubomyr HUZAR. “This brings you to an absolutely logical question: is it a sin to live in prosperity? No, of course, not. Wealth in itself is not something bad. The only problem is that wealthy people, as a rule, feel so self-sufficient that they do not need God. In the new audio book I emphasize the statement that one has to know how to be rich! For example, those people could help orphans or sick people, or support culture. After all, they could create jobs by opening their own business. There is a great number of possible options.
“Unfortunately, there are many people (not only in Ukraine) who don’t know how to use their wealth properly. Thus, many of our got-rich-quick men, so called new Ukrainians, don’t know what to do with their property. They want to show off to others that they are some important people. In order to do so they build themselves a few stored mansions, drive luxury vehicles, and even fly on private airplanes… However, most of them stay shallow and often unhappy deep inside. Because, a truly rich person is rich not only with property but is also rich in spirit. Such person is aware of that his wealth is a God’s gift. Besides, it is not the beginning of everything. Thus, for such a person other people are on the first place and he is able to treat them with respect.
“I remember, when I was a student I had a part-time job in a hotel in a resort area. My responsibilities included meeting people, when they checked in. There were different people there: millionaires, who, when asked to wait, did it patiently; middle-class representatives, who also showed politeness in unexpected situations; and got-rich-quick men, who would sniff just as they entered the hotel showing that they didn’t like a thing about it – in one word, they acted out of line and you could tell right away who they were. Obviously, a truly wealthy person, especially those from wealthy families, unlike the ones who acquired their wealth just recently, is of high culture.
“Maybe children of our got-rich-quick men could become truly wealthy people – in soul, spirit, and money. Of course, if they will keep that legacy.”
Your Beatitude, you said that wealth is not a sin. What about strive to become rich?
“However, there exists a problem. Modern TV strongly propagates as an ideal a young, healthy, rich person, who can do whatever he pleases. Let’s say an ordinary boy or girl watches a TV program of such kind and thinks: ‘How great it would be to have lots of money!’ Instead, they’d better encouraged young people to develop their talents, study one or two professions, and become competitive specialists.”
Your Beatitude, you are one of the greatest moral authorities of our time. Many people have made attempts to win your favor. Some do it just for the sake of it and others – for covetous aims. Thus do you gladly receive donations from everyone or do you do it selectively?
“When someone wants sincerely to make a donation, I would gladly tell about the possibilities: Patriarchal Cathedral, other churches and monasteries, Ukrainian Catholic University, orphanages, hospitals, nursing homes… Then the person can make his choice. If the person asks to guide him saying that I know better who feels greater need at the moment, I do it. But if I realize that this person wants to bribe me, I immediately deny.
“I will frankly tell you that I have never accepted gifts for myself. What do I need? I have roof above my head and my plate is not empty. Ok, I need to buy medicine regularly, but, thank God, I have enough money for that. Do I want something bigger to show off to others: ‘Look, I keep serious money on my account in a bank.’ Do you think I’ll be able to take it with me when I die? This is my philosophy.”
Recently I have witnessed a complicated discussion about how to use dozens of thousands euro for surgeries on seriously ill children that would continue their lives for several months, a few years at most, when there are so many other ill people around who need help?
“Ukrainian Orthodox Church has many good radio programs. The host of one of such programs is the deacon Mykola Lysenko. At the end of almost every program he tells about the needs. For example, money is needed for a surgery for such and such child. Then he tells the phone number of child’s parents. After some time he reports about the progress or the final outcome, thanking the contributors from time to time. I think, in other churches and in our society we have to follow this example. The question about whether it will be able to save a child’s life and for how long will doctors be able to prolong their lives is secondary. God decides how long each of us should live. Sometimes there are prognoses for only a few months but a person lives for 20 years.”
Since this fact has charitable nature and it is only a week left before Christmas, what would be your emergency recipes for kindness?
“Recently, within the framework of social days held by our church I have visited Cherkasy. Answering questions there I suggested the following recipe: ‘Every night dwell on what has God done for you today and then think about what you have done for others.’ This will be a wonderful observance of the fasting and not only fasting.”
Would you please make a short review of the passing year in social, political, and church spheres?
“As for church life, our circle of dialogue has been expanding. On December 1 the leaders of UOC, UOC-KP, and UGCC together made a statement on the situation in Ukraine.”
By the way, in your opinion, has public heard that statement?
“You, journalist, ask me about it? You’d have to be the one to inform me. (Laughs.) Between you and me, I think they haven’t yet. Very many important events are taking place in the same time, like, for example, the EU-Ukraine Summit. However, I think they will eventually hear it. In a few months we plan to have an all-Ukrainian round table. Besides, there will be local round tables held. We will discuss the situation and the way we should react to it. Those shouldn’t be merely intellectual and academic tasks. Our goal is to lead to changes. The only condition of church leaders is to do it in a peaceful way.
“What concerns the society itself, I am seeing presence of civil way of thinking more and more in people these days. They begin to understand that the state does not exist to give them something. The state is not capable of giving. Instead, we should take the responsibility and by common efforts achieve concrete results.
“Maybe some would consider the year 2011 counterproductive, but I am an optimist. With joy I notice those little changes on the way of our transformation from Soviet people into Ukrainians.”
“What concerns the society itself, I am seeing presence of civil way of thinking more and more in people these days. They begin to understand that the state does not exist to give them something. The state is not capable of giving. Instead, we should take the responsibility and by common efforts achieve concrete results.
“Maybe some would consider the year 2011 counterproductive, but I am an optimist. With joy I notice those little changes on the way of our transformation from Soviet people into Ukrainians.”
Your Beatitude, what would your wishes be for the Ukrainian people in the New Year?
“To understand that God loves us!”
Tuesday, December 27, 2011
Patriarch Sviatoslav Calls Monks to Move to Kyiv
SOURCE: RISU
On 26 December, in the retreat center of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church in Briukhovychi, Lviv, a session of the Committee on Matters of Monastics was held with the participation of Patriarch Sviatoslav. The head of UGCC reminded the audience that the Synod of Bishops at its last session called the ministers to support the persons who feel vocation to consecrated life.
“The strategy adopted by the bishops is not only about vocation to priesthood but also to consecrated life,” stressed Patriarch Sviatoslav.
The patriarch called the monastics to transfer the provincial houses of the orders and associations to the capital.
“The synodal descision contains an address to the bishops regarding the presence of representatives of the monastics in the eparchies. I would like most of the provincial houses of the monastic orders and associations to be transferred from Lviv to Kyiv. This will dramatically change your vision of your presence in the Church,” said the hierarch.
Patriarch Sviatoslav also asked the participants to help to prepare a pastoral address to the monastics. "Without your cooperation, no such program can be implemented, for it is needed both in Galicia and the eastern Ukraine," stressed the patriarch.
On 26 December, in the retreat center of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church in Briukhovychi, Lviv, a session of the Committee on Matters of Monastics was held with the participation of Patriarch Sviatoslav. The head of UGCC reminded the audience that the Synod of Bishops at its last session called the ministers to support the persons who feel vocation to consecrated life.
“The strategy adopted by the bishops is not only about vocation to priesthood but also to consecrated life,” stressed Patriarch Sviatoslav.
The patriarch called the monastics to transfer the provincial houses of the orders and associations to the capital.
“The synodal descision contains an address to the bishops regarding the presence of representatives of the monastics in the eparchies. I would like most of the provincial houses of the monastic orders and associations to be transferred from Lviv to Kyiv. This will dramatically change your vision of your presence in the Church,” said the hierarch.
Patriarch Sviatoslav also asked the participants to help to prepare a pastoral address to the monastics. "Without your cooperation, no such program can be implemented, for it is needed both in Galicia and the eastern Ukraine," stressed the patriarch.
Monday, December 26, 2011
Become a bone marrow donor--it's easy!
Andrew Brode while he was in outpatient chemo treatment at Princess Margaret Hospital.
My wife, Oksana Brode (Komar) and I are trying to spread the word on getting more Canadians to become Bone Marrow donors. We have used the internet and various newspapers here in Ontario.
Our son Andrew (30 years old) was diagnosed with AML (Acute Myloid Leukemia) earlier this year and has been both an inpatient and outpatient at Princess Margaret Hospital since late May of this year. He is now in remission and will be going for regular blood tests to check that the Leukemia has not come back.
They would like to do a bone marrow transplant to greatly minimize the chance of it returning but have as yet have not been able to find a matching donor. This is an ongoing worldwide search. To that end he would like to ask as many of his friends from his former Schools and St. May's Dormition, Mississauga, if they would consent to be donors. The process is as easy as giving blood.
Below is a quote from Andrew's Blog ( http://jabrode.com/) which he established for his friends when this started. It provides details of where people can go and what is involved to donate. There is an age limit of 50 years for bone marrow donors.
This leads me onto my next point. I ask everyone out there reading this to join www.onematch.ca or http://marrow.org/Join/Join_the_Registry.aspxwww.onematch.ca or http://marrow.org/Join/Join_the_Registry.aspx in the US.
Please pass this onto your friends, friends of friends, and their friends. The procedure is SUPER easy. You take a short quiz to understand the process, fill in your details, and they send you a swab kit in the mail. Once the kit arrives, you swab your cheeks and send it back.
If you ever get to the point where you get to save someone's life, the process is exactly like giving blood. You sit in a chair for a couple hours while they draw your blood, run it through a machine to extrapolate what they need, and put your blood back in. The old days where they drill into your hip are gone.
Please please please sign up as soon as possible. I know a lot of you out there have already, but getting onto the list can take a few months, and the sooner they find a match for me, the better off I'll be. And if you don't happen to match me, perhaps you will match someone else and save their life."
Thank You in advance for any assistance in this matter.
regards, Uwe Brode
My wife, Oksana Brode (Komar) and I are trying to spread the word on getting more Canadians to become Bone Marrow donors. We have used the internet and various newspapers here in Ontario.
Our son Andrew (30 years old) was diagnosed with AML (Acute Myloid Leukemia) earlier this year and has been both an inpatient and outpatient at Princess Margaret Hospital since late May of this year. He is now in remission and will be going for regular blood tests to check that the Leukemia has not come back.
They would like to do a bone marrow transplant to greatly minimize the chance of it returning but have as yet have not been able to find a matching donor. This is an ongoing worldwide search. To that end he would like to ask as many of his friends from his former Schools and St. May's Dormition, Mississauga, if they would consent to be donors. The process is as easy as giving blood.
Below is a quote from Andrew's Blog ( http://jabrode.com/) which he established for his friends when this started. It provides details of where people can go and what is involved to donate. There is an age limit of 50 years for bone marrow donors.
"Register and Save a (my) Life!
This leads me onto my next point. I ask everyone out there reading this to join www.onematch.ca or http://marrow.org/Join/Join_the_Registry.aspxwww.onematch.ca or http://marrow.org/Join/Join_the_Registry.aspx in the US.
Please pass this onto your friends, friends of friends, and their friends. The procedure is SUPER easy. You take a short quiz to understand the process, fill in your details, and they send you a swab kit in the mail. Once the kit arrives, you swab your cheeks and send it back.
If you ever get to the point where you get to save someone's life, the process is exactly like giving blood. You sit in a chair for a couple hours while they draw your blood, run it through a machine to extrapolate what they need, and put your blood back in. The old days where they drill into your hip are gone.
Please please please sign up as soon as possible. I know a lot of you out there have already, but getting onto the list can take a few months, and the sooner they find a match for me, the better off I'll be. And if you don't happen to match me, perhaps you will match someone else and save their life."
Thank You in advance for any assistance in this matter.
regards, Uwe Brode
Patriarch Sviatoslav Greets Roman Catholics of Ukraine on Christmas
SOURCE: RISU
On December 24, the head of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, Patriarch Sviatoslav Shevchuk, participated in the Christmas Mass of the Roman Catholics of Ukraine in the Church of Assumption of Blessed Virgin Mary in Lviv.
Archbishop Mieczyslav Mokrzycki of Lviv of the Roman Catholic Church expressed his joy over the fact that the head of UGCC participated in the Liturgy “to share together the joy of the Birth of Christ,” reported the Information Department of UGCC.
“We had opportunities many times to meet and today I am very glad that you have come to us, to Lviv to share with us the joy of the Birth of Christ. It is a very great honor and joy for us,” said the archbishop.
In his turn, Patriarch Sviatoslav said it is “a great honor for him to greet everyone on the bright feast of Christmas on behalf of the entire Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church.”
On December 24, the head of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, Patriarch Sviatoslav Shevchuk, participated in the Christmas Mass of the Roman Catholics of Ukraine in the Church of Assumption of Blessed Virgin Mary in Lviv.
Archbishop Mieczyslav Mokrzycki of Lviv of the Roman Catholic Church expressed his joy over the fact that the head of UGCC participated in the Liturgy “to share together the joy of the Birth of Christ,” reported the Information Department of UGCC.
“We had opportunities many times to meet and today I am very glad that you have come to us, to Lviv to share with us the joy of the Birth of Christ. It is a very great honor and joy for us,” said the archbishop.
In his turn, Patriarch Sviatoslav said it is “a great honor for him to greet everyone on the bright feast of Christmas on behalf of the entire Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church.”
Beauty of churches may lead to higher thoughts
SOURCE: The Columbus Dispatch
Ten years ago, I was traveling with a group of international journalists up the Volga River to investigate the long-closed “Old Russia” of great monastery settlements that ruled Russia from the 10th century until communism. And we found ourselves starting out from Yaroslavl, about five hours east of Moscow.
It was a lovely city, and I was particularly enchanted by the exquisite cupolas of several Russian Orthodox churches rising above the river. “How beautiful,” I thought. Then, before sailing, our guide showed us prints of the “Old Yaroslavl” in a museum.
“You should have seen the pre-Revolutionary Yaroslavl,” Valery said sadly as he showed us the images lost in reality. “It looked like a fairy-tale city. There were 77 practicing Orthodox churches, six monasteries, two Roman Catholic churches, one Protestant church, four synagogues and three mosques.”
At this, I was breathless, thinking of how rich in beauty this city must have been.
Indeed, this was one of the founts of the “Third Rome,” the idea that, after Rome and Istanbul (Constantinople), Russia was the third great center of religious learning. Then came communism in 1917, Joseph Stalin in the 1930s — and destruction.
“They couldn’t destroy it all,” Valerie explained. “So now we have 22 active Orthodox churches — but none of the rest.”
I bring up this experience now because Christmas is here, and I think the loss of places of worship profoundly affects the celebration of Christ’s birth.
Think only of the loss of beauty. Imagine what Yaroslavl would be like with 77 Orthodox churches with their graceful onion domes rising above the river, along with monasteries, Roman Catholic and Protestant churches, synagogues and mosques. People would sing out in joy at the very glimpse of such spiritual riches.
This also made me think more broadly. Even for people like Christopher Hitchens, renowned author and avowed atheist who died last week, never for a moment giving up his hearty denial of God’s existence, the aesthetics of Christmas must, at some level, have moved him.
Thus I wonder, that even if you have the chutzpah to deny God — and don’t blame me, I do not — how can you imagine a world without churches or synagogues? And how can you live intellectually in a world of ideas and principles, where so many references lead you eventually back to the Bible — and not acknowledge religious thought?
The splendid architecture of churches, outlined across the early evening skies of Yaroslavl — or San Francisco or Pusan — tells us aesthetically that God is there, with us at least in form.
Think of how the hard-line, destructive Soviets tried after 1917 to destroy every vestige of religion in Soviet Russia. In Moscow, the great Church of Christ the Savior was demolished for a “ people’s” swimming pool. And this destruction of institutions representing the highest of human beings’ dreams and faith was nothing new. When the Mongols came sweeping out of the east in the 12th century, they destroyed all the churches in “Christian Kiev,” leaving only mountains of skulls and cutting off, until the post-1991 age, Kiev’s budding relations with Western Europe.
The Soviets were endlessly creative when it came to humiliating their people and to humbling their churches. In town after town, churches were made into grain storage places and, sometimes, museums of atheism.
The destruction of churches has marked history for centuries. The Muslims destroyed the Christian churches in the Middle East; and the Christians fought back with the Crusades, with children wading into the Mediterranean for the “Children’s Crusade.” It was alwa
ys more the physical symbols that the outsiders were trying to destroy or diminish, rather than the more difficult-to-absorb writings of the faith.
I kept wondering that day in Yaroslavl, when I saw that lovely city stripped of its most beautiful buildings, about how empty the world would be without churches. Indeed, the Soviets showed us the criminal emptiness that would be the next step.
So I am obsessed this Christmas with the idea that, first, we should look hard at our churches — at the outer structural forms of our faiths — and wonder what kind of a world we would have without them. Then we should listen to what the prophets were trying to tell us about the core principles of our faiths.
Surely that would enrich us in our personal lives — and might also greatly enrich us in our public and political lives.
Georgie Anne Geyer writes for Universal Press Syndicate.
Ten years ago, I was traveling with a group of international journalists up the Volga River to investigate the long-closed “Old Russia” of great monastery settlements that ruled Russia from the 10th century until communism. And we found ourselves starting out from Yaroslavl, about five hours east of Moscow.
It was a lovely city, and I was particularly enchanted by the exquisite cupolas of several Russian Orthodox churches rising above the river. “How beautiful,” I thought. Then, before sailing, our guide showed us prints of the “Old Yaroslavl” in a museum.
“You should have seen the pre-Revolutionary Yaroslavl,” Valery said sadly as he showed us the images lost in reality. “It looked like a fairy-tale city. There were 77 practicing Orthodox churches, six monasteries, two Roman Catholic churches, one Protestant church, four synagogues and three mosques.”
At this, I was breathless, thinking of how rich in beauty this city must have been.
Indeed, this was one of the founts of the “Third Rome,” the idea that, after Rome and Istanbul (Constantinople), Russia was the third great center of religious learning. Then came communism in 1917, Joseph Stalin in the 1930s — and destruction.
“They couldn’t destroy it all,” Valerie explained. “So now we have 22 active Orthodox churches — but none of the rest.”
![]() |
| Solovki Monastery...on the Feast of Theophany |
Think only of the loss of beauty. Imagine what Yaroslavl would be like with 77 Orthodox churches with their graceful onion domes rising above the river, along with monasteries, Roman Catholic and Protestant churches, synagogues and mosques. People would sing out in joy at the very glimpse of such spiritual riches.
This also made me think more broadly. Even for people like Christopher Hitchens, renowned author and avowed atheist who died last week, never for a moment giving up his hearty denial of God’s existence, the aesthetics of Christmas must, at some level, have moved him.
Thus I wonder, that even if you have the chutzpah to deny God — and don’t blame me, I do not — how can you imagine a world without churches or synagogues? And how can you live intellectually in a world of ideas and principles, where so many references lead you eventually back to the Bible — and not acknowledge religious thought?
The splendid architecture of churches, outlined across the early evening skies of Yaroslavl — or San Francisco or Pusan — tells us aesthetically that God is there, with us at least in form.
![]() |
| St. Elias Church, Brampton...on the Feast of St. Stephen the Protomartyr |
The Soviets were endlessly creative when it came to humiliating their people and to humbling their churches. In town after town, churches were made into grain storage places and, sometimes, museums of atheism.
The destruction of churches has marked history for centuries. The Muslims destroyed the Christian churches in the Middle East; and the Christians fought back with the Crusades, with children wading into the Mediterranean for the “Children’s Crusade.” It was alwa
ys more the physical symbols that the outsiders were trying to destroy or diminish, rather than the more difficult-to-absorb writings of the faith.
I kept wondering that day in Yaroslavl, when I saw that lovely city stripped of its most beautiful buildings, about how empty the world would be without churches. Indeed, the Soviets showed us the criminal emptiness that would be the next step.
So I am obsessed this Christmas with the idea that, first, we should look hard at our churches — at the outer structural forms of our faiths — and wonder what kind of a world we would have without them. Then we should listen to what the prophets were trying to tell us about the core principles of our faiths.
Surely that would enrich us in our personal lives — and might also greatly enrich us in our public and political lives.
Georgie Anne Geyer writes for Universal Press Syndicate.
The Orthodox Syrian Christians in India
SOURCE: Times of India
They are among the oldest Christian community in India, going as far back as 52 CE when St Thomas, an apostle of Jesus Christ, came to India. The Orthodox Syrian Christians are different. They have many rituals which are common to Hindus too.
Though there are over 252 Christian denominations in India, the Orthodox Syrian Christians are perhaps the most inclusive. Their rituals hark back 2,000 years and their liturgy, which used to be completely in Syriac, still has vestiges of it with Syrian words such as Barikamore meaning bless me Lord. In seminaries, the liturgical language is still Syriac.
Christianity, in fact, can be divided into western and eastern churches. The Orthodox Church in India is part of eastern churches like those in Armenia, Russia, Ethiopia, Eritrea and Syria. Most have the same tunes in their liturgy and it's not uncommon to see Ethiopian students studying in India visiting Orthodox churches and feeling quite at home with the awe-inspiring and stunning rituals, despite not knowing the language.
An inclusive lot
Are the Orthodox Syrian Christians any different from Syrian Christians? "No, Syrian Christians are a large group and include Orthodox Syrians, Canaanites, Marthomites from Kerala and Malankara Catholics," says Yuhanon Mar Demetrois, assistant metropolitan of the Delhi Diocese. "They comprise some 10 groups," he adds.
The Orthodox Syrians, too, are divided into two groups - the Malankara Syrians (Jacobites) who owe their allegiance to the Patriarch of Antioch in Syria and the Malankara Orthodox Syrians, headquartered in Kottayam.
Unlike Catholics whose supreme head is the Pope in Vatican, the head of the Orthodox Syrians is His Holiness Baselios Mar Thoma Didymus I, the Catholicos of the East and Malankara Metropolitan. He is helped by 30 Metropolitans, each of whom has a set area of the world under his jurisdiction.
"The term 'orthodox' comes from ortho or straight and doxo or glory and means one who glorifies God with a straight face," says father M C Poulose of St Mary's Orthodox Cathedral in Hauz Khas, Delhi. He says the community is conservative about its rituals. But it's also one of the more innovative communities, opening up education to its women and working for the upliftment of dalits much before it caught social attention.
Jigi Thomson, special DG, Organising Committee of the Commonwealth Games 2010, and a fervent Orthodox Syrian Christian himself, adds, "We are supposed to have been part of the Hindu nobility before St Thomas converted us, so many consider themselves a cut above the rest." The royal family of Travancore would also bestow certain privileges on them.
Hindu elements in rituals
Many of their rituals have a Hindu influence. For instance, take marriage. Just like the mangalsutra, which is tied around the bride's neck, this community has the min, a small piece of gold with the cross embossed on it. Before any auspicious occasion, a lamp is lit, just like it is among Hindus. "You won't find this among Catholics or Protestants," says Thomson. "All our churches also have the kurshumoodh (cross) opposite the altar, quite like a flagstaff opposite the sanctum sanctorum in temples." It is the only church where the East is all-important. All churches and cemeteries have to face the East; all prayers should be recited facing the East. Why? The Book of Revelations has said the second coming of Christ will be from the East.
Also, all bishops have to wear a red cassock. Red, says Thomson, symbolises death and was the colour of the garment worn by Jesus when he was being taken to Calvary to be crucified. "It means our bishops are destined to die for the sake of Christ," he explains.
The Orthodox Syrians have a very ceremonial form of liturgy, says Demetrios. "We try to convey the image of Christ in all his glory and resplendence like a king. The colour, adornments and grandeur inspire awe and reverence." The penitent's olfactory and visual senses are also subsumed by the fragrance of the kunduri or incense, satin and silk vestments and intricately stitched velvet half shoes of the priest, jingle of bells, the wavering flame of numerous candles and the gold and silver threads woven into curtains. "Colours have significance - red is associated with martyrs, gold with Christ, blue with Mother Mary and so on," says Demetrois.
Friendly people
They're hard-working; many are in top echelons of government and include the likes of P C Alexander, principal secretary of Indira Gandhi and Oommen Chandy, ex-chief minister of Kerala. But even as the community is proud of its religiosity, many say it has to move with the times if it has to survive. It is important to make the liturgy and songs intelligible to its parishioners, many of whom have studied outside Kerala and may not be familiar with Malayalam.
Another grouse is the timings of Christmas and Easter celebrations which start at 2 am, in keeping with olden times. Also, many of its churches have removed benches from inside, making prayers a truly tiring exercise for the elderly. But no matter who they are or what they do, on Sundays, the Orthodox Syrian heart will always be in the gothic environs of his beautiful church. The beauty of Kerala, in fact, is incomplete without the white church spires reaching out to the azure skies against the background of the backwaters and green paddy fields.
They are among the oldest Christian community in India, going as far back as 52 CE when St Thomas, an apostle of Jesus Christ, came to India. The Orthodox Syrian Christians are different. They have many rituals which are common to Hindus too.
Though there are over 252 Christian denominations in India, the Orthodox Syrian Christians are perhaps the most inclusive. Their rituals hark back 2,000 years and their liturgy, which used to be completely in Syriac, still has vestiges of it with Syrian words such as Barikamore meaning bless me Lord. In seminaries, the liturgical language is still Syriac.
![]() |
| H.B. Catholicos Aboon Mor Baselios Thomas I Bava with the Metropolitans of the Syrian Church in India during the consecration of five Metropolitans at the St. Thomas church, Paravur on 3 July 2006 |
An inclusive lot
Are the Orthodox Syrian Christians any different from Syrian Christians? "No, Syrian Christians are a large group and include Orthodox Syrians, Canaanites, Marthomites from Kerala and Malankara Catholics," says Yuhanon Mar Demetrois, assistant metropolitan of the Delhi Diocese. "They comprise some 10 groups," he adds.
The Orthodox Syrians, too, are divided into two groups - the Malankara Syrians (Jacobites) who owe their allegiance to the Patriarch of Antioch in Syria and the Malankara Orthodox Syrians, headquartered in Kottayam.
Unlike Catholics whose supreme head is the Pope in Vatican, the head of the Orthodox Syrians is His Holiness Baselios Mar Thoma Didymus I, the Catholicos of the East and Malankara Metropolitan. He is helped by 30 Metropolitans, each of whom has a set area of the world under his jurisdiction.
"The term 'orthodox' comes from ortho or straight and doxo or glory and means one who glorifies God with a straight face," says father M C Poulose of St Mary's Orthodox Cathedral in Hauz Khas, Delhi. He says the community is conservative about its rituals. But it's also one of the more innovative communities, opening up education to its women and working for the upliftment of dalits much before it caught social attention.
Jigi Thomson, special DG, Organising Committee of the Commonwealth Games 2010, and a fervent Orthodox Syrian Christian himself, adds, "We are supposed to have been part of the Hindu nobility before St Thomas converted us, so many consider themselves a cut above the rest." The royal family of Travancore would also bestow certain privileges on them.
Hindu elements in rituals
Many of their rituals have a Hindu influence. For instance, take marriage. Just like the mangalsutra, which is tied around the bride's neck, this community has the min, a small piece of gold with the cross embossed on it. Before any auspicious occasion, a lamp is lit, just like it is among Hindus. "You won't find this among Catholics or Protestants," says Thomson. "All our churches also have the kurshumoodh (cross) opposite the altar, quite like a flagstaff opposite the sanctum sanctorum in temples." It is the only church where the East is all-important. All churches and cemeteries have to face the East; all prayers should be recited facing the East. Why? The Book of Revelations has said the second coming of Christ will be from the East.
![]() |
| On the Feast of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary |
The Orthodox Syrians have a very ceremonial form of liturgy, says Demetrios. "We try to convey the image of Christ in all his glory and resplendence like a king. The colour, adornments and grandeur inspire awe and reverence." The penitent's olfactory and visual senses are also subsumed by the fragrance of the kunduri or incense, satin and silk vestments and intricately stitched velvet half shoes of the priest, jingle of bells, the wavering flame of numerous candles and the gold and silver threads woven into curtains. "Colours have significance - red is associated with martyrs, gold with Christ, blue with Mother Mary and so on," says Demetrois.
Friendly people
They're hard-working; many are in top echelons of government and include the likes of P C Alexander, principal secretary of Indira Gandhi and Oommen Chandy, ex-chief minister of Kerala. But even as the community is proud of its religiosity, many say it has to move with the times if it has to survive. It is important to make the liturgy and songs intelligible to its parishioners, many of whom have studied outside Kerala and may not be familiar with Malayalam.
Another grouse is the timings of Christmas and Easter celebrations which start at 2 am, in keeping with olden times. Also, many of its churches have removed benches from inside, making prayers a truly tiring exercise for the elderly. But no matter who they are or what they do, on Sundays, the Orthodox Syrian heart will always be in the gothic environs of his beautiful church. The beauty of Kerala, in fact, is incomplete without the white church spires reaching out to the azure skies against the background of the backwaters and green paddy fields.
Sunday, December 25, 2011
Winning the war on Christmas
SOURCE: National Post
Despite the best efforts of radical atheists, secular humanists and the legions of the politically correct, Christmas has managed to survive. After more than two decades of frontal assaults on Christmas designed to expunge references to the holiday from public spaces, nearly three-quarters of Canadians told Ipsos-Reid pollsters last week that they view this as the Christmas season, not the “holiday season,” and they wish one another “merry Christmas,” rather than the more generic, “happy holidays.” And while it’s purely anecdotal, I’ve noticed more store clerks, more receptionists, letter carriers and strangers in the street offering Christmas greetings.
Not surprisingly, the sense that this is Christmas, and worth preserving, is highest among middle-aged and older Canadians. Among those 35 to 54 years old, 73% see this as the Christmas season, while among those 55 and older, 80% share that view. The sentiment is even catching on among younger Canadians in hearteningly solid numbers. Two-thirds of those aged 18 to 34 prefer the Christmas term, up a startling 10 percentage points from 2010.
That’s not to say the war on Christmas is over. Far from it.
There will still be judges who decree that Christmas trees be moved from the foyer of the courthouse into a backroom, where few can see them, lest their presence in the lobby give affront to hypersensitive non-Christians. There will still be public schools that cancel their Christmas concert in favour of a “winter family festival.” Each year some teacher will realize that candy canes are fashioned after a shepherd’s crook. She will then make the connection with Jesus the shepherd and ban candy canes from her classroom. A wounded atheist will demand his or her community remove its nativity scene from the town square. Some chain of stores will get caught instructing its employees to avoid wishing customers a Merry Christmas. Politically correct politicians will erect “holiday” trees, as if any other major religion’s holiday decorates firs and spruces with bright lights and glittering ornament. (It’s a Christmas tree. Call it that.)
The war on Christmas is nearly as old as Christmas itself, so it is never going to end entirely. But I sense a dam has broken, a hump has been overcome and that – at least for a while – Christmas is back in favour. The odd school is sneaking one of the traditional carols into its Saturnalia Festival – not simply “Here Comes Santa Claus.” (I’ve even heard rumours about whole recitals devoted to sacred music and referred to as Christmas concerts, again.)
The Walmart greeter, who two Christmases ago had been instructed by head office to wish “happy Holidays,” is now freely wishing merry Christmas to everyone and anyone who passes through the front doors. It’s probably good for business, too. People steeped in North American traditions, whether regular church go-oers or not, have recently become more and more troubled by campaigns that seek to erase the kind of Christmases they remember from their youths. They have pushed back by complaining about stores that attack Christmas, and buy refusing to products from them.
It’s no time to stop watching for new attacks on Christmas; they will come. But Canadians who care about Christmas can take solace that the worse may be over and that their beloved Christmas will carry on for a few more years, at least.
Despite the best efforts of radical atheists, secular humanists and the legions of the politically correct, Christmas has managed to survive. After more than two decades of frontal assaults on Christmas designed to expunge references to the holiday from public spaces, nearly three-quarters of Canadians told Ipsos-Reid pollsters last week that they view this as the Christmas season, not the “holiday season,” and they wish one another “merry Christmas,” rather than the more generic, “happy holidays.” And while it’s purely anecdotal, I’ve noticed more store clerks, more receptionists, letter carriers and strangers in the street offering Christmas greetings.
Not surprisingly, the sense that this is Christmas, and worth preserving, is highest among middle-aged and older Canadians. Among those 35 to 54 years old, 73% see this as the Christmas season, while among those 55 and older, 80% share that view. The sentiment is even catching on among younger Canadians in hearteningly solid numbers. Two-thirds of those aged 18 to 34 prefer the Christmas term, up a startling 10 percentage points from 2010.
That’s not to say the war on Christmas is over. Far from it.
There will still be judges who decree that Christmas trees be moved from the foyer of the courthouse into a backroom, where few can see them, lest their presence in the lobby give affront to hypersensitive non-Christians. There will still be public schools that cancel their Christmas concert in favour of a “winter family festival.” Each year some teacher will realize that candy canes are fashioned after a shepherd’s crook. She will then make the connection with Jesus the shepherd and ban candy canes from her classroom. A wounded atheist will demand his or her community remove its nativity scene from the town square. Some chain of stores will get caught instructing its employees to avoid wishing customers a Merry Christmas. Politically correct politicians will erect “holiday” trees, as if any other major religion’s holiday decorates firs and spruces with bright lights and glittering ornament. (It’s a Christmas tree. Call it that.)
The war on Christmas is nearly as old as Christmas itself, so it is never going to end entirely. But I sense a dam has broken, a hump has been overcome and that – at least for a while – Christmas is back in favour. The odd school is sneaking one of the traditional carols into its Saturnalia Festival – not simply “Here Comes Santa Claus.” (I’ve even heard rumours about whole recitals devoted to sacred music and referred to as Christmas concerts, again.)
The Walmart greeter, who two Christmases ago had been instructed by head office to wish “happy Holidays,” is now freely wishing merry Christmas to everyone and anyone who passes through the front doors. It’s probably good for business, too. People steeped in North American traditions, whether regular church go-oers or not, have recently become more and more troubled by campaigns that seek to erase the kind of Christmases they remember from their youths. They have pushed back by complaining about stores that attack Christmas, and buy refusing to products from them.
It’s no time to stop watching for new attacks on Christmas; they will come. But Canadians who care about Christmas can take solace that the worse may be over and that their beloved Christmas will carry on for a few more years, at least.
This Week in Christian History (December 25)
SOURCE: beliefNet
December 25
December 25, 496: King Clovis, who united Gaul and founded France, is baptized in the Cathedral of Rheims, followed by 3,000 of his soldiers. "Worship what you once burned, and burn what you worshipped," the priest instructed him. However, Clovis and his troops showed little change after their "conversion" and apparently believed Christ was merely a war god who would grant them victory if they prayed for it.
December 25, 800: Pope Leo III is crowns Charlemagne, the first ruler of the Holy Roman Empire.
December 26
December 26, 1065: The first building of Westminster Abbey is dedicated, though legend holds that the abbey was founded as early as 616.
December 27
December 27, 1784: Francis Asbury is ordained superintendent of the Methodist Church in America. He later took the title "bishop," against the wishes of John Wesley (see issue 2: John Wesley and issue 45: Camp Meetings and Circuit Riders).
December 27, 1899: American temperance leader Carry Nation wrecks her first saloon in Medicine Lodge, Kansas.
December 28
December 28, 1797: American theologian Charles Hodge, whose three-volume Systematic Theology has influenced seminarians for over 100 years, is born.
December 29
December 29, 1849: The carol "It Came Upon a Midnight Clear," by pastor Edmund H. Sears, appears for the first time in The Christian Register.
December 29, 1851: The first Y.M.C.A. in the United States is organized in Boston.
December 29, 1876: Hymnwriter Philip P. Bliss and his family fall to their deaths when a bridge collapses under the train they were riding. Bliss's compositions include "Man of Sorrows—What a Name!"; "Jesus Loves Even Me"; "Almost Persuaded"; the music to "It Is Well with My Soul"; and one hymn discovered in his trunk, which was on a different train that night: "I Will Sing of My Redeemer.
December 30
December 30, 1823: Charles G. Finney, the most effective evangelist America had ever seen, is licensed to preach (see issue 20: Charles Finney).
December 30, 1852: Future U.S. President Rutherford B. Hayes marries "Lemonade "Lucy," so called because, as first lady, she forbade alcohol in the Executive Mansion. The Hayeses were both devout Methodists who began each day with prayer and organized Sunday evening worship services at the White House.
December 31
December 31, 1384: John Wycliffe, pre-Reformer who initiated the first complete translation of the Bible into English and influenced Hus, Luther and Calvin, dies at about 64. He was condemned at the council of Constance (1415), and his body was disinterred and burned (see issue 3: John Wycliffe).
December 25
December 25, 496: King Clovis, who united Gaul and founded France, is baptized in the Cathedral of Rheims, followed by 3,000 of his soldiers. "Worship what you once burned, and burn what you worshipped," the priest instructed him. However, Clovis and his troops showed little change after their "conversion" and apparently believed Christ was merely a war god who would grant them victory if they prayed for it.
December 25, 800: Pope Leo III is crowns Charlemagne, the first ruler of the Holy Roman Empire.
December 26
December 26, 1065: The first building of Westminster Abbey is dedicated, though legend holds that the abbey was founded as early as 616.
December 27
December 27, 1784: Francis Asbury is ordained superintendent of the Methodist Church in America. He later took the title "bishop," against the wishes of John Wesley (see issue 2: John Wesley and issue 45: Camp Meetings and Circuit Riders).
December 27, 1899: American temperance leader Carry Nation wrecks her first saloon in Medicine Lodge, Kansas.
December 28
December 28, 1797: American theologian Charles Hodge, whose three-volume Systematic Theology has influenced seminarians for over 100 years, is born.
December 29
December 29, 1849: The carol "It Came Upon a Midnight Clear," by pastor Edmund H. Sears, appears for the first time in The Christian Register.
December 29, 1851: The first Y.M.C.A. in the United States is organized in Boston.
December 29, 1876: Hymnwriter Philip P. Bliss and his family fall to their deaths when a bridge collapses under the train they were riding. Bliss's compositions include "Man of Sorrows—What a Name!"; "Jesus Loves Even Me"; "Almost Persuaded"; the music to "It Is Well with My Soul"; and one hymn discovered in his trunk, which was on a different train that night: "I Will Sing of My Redeemer.
December 30
December 30, 1823: Charles G. Finney, the most effective evangelist America had ever seen, is licensed to preach (see issue 20: Charles Finney).
December 30, 1852: Future U.S. President Rutherford B. Hayes marries "Lemonade "Lucy," so called because, as first lady, she forbade alcohol in the Executive Mansion. The Hayeses were both devout Methodists who began each day with prayer and organized Sunday evening worship services at the White House.
December 31
December 31, 1384: John Wycliffe, pre-Reformer who initiated the first complete translation of the Bible into English and influenced Hus, Luther and Calvin, dies at about 64. He was condemned at the council of Constance (1415), and his body was disinterred and burned (see issue 3: John Wycliffe).
Saturday, December 24, 2011
Orthodox Christmas, Grand Rapids, MI
St. John Chrysostom Russian Orthodox Church, Grand Rapids, Michigan, U.S.A.
Midnight Masses canceled in Iraq because of growing security concerns
SOURCE: Catholic News Service
LONDON (CNS) -- Chaldean Catholic officials have canceled traditional Christmas Eve midnight Masses because of security risks.
Chaldean Archbishop Louis Sako of Kirkuk in northern Iraq told the agency Aid to the Church in Need that Christians will spend Christmas in "great fear" because of the risk of new attacks.
All services and Masses have been scheduled for daylight hours, he said in an interview with Rome-based AsiaNews.
"Midnight Christmas Mass has been canceled in Baghdad, Mosul and Kirkuk as a consequence of the never-ending assassinations of Christians," he said, citing the Oct. 31, 2010, attack on the Syrian Catholic cathedral that left 57 people dead in the Iraqi capital.
Archbishop Sako also expressed concern over the growing conflict between Sunni and Shiite Muslims vying for political power. He said the conflict has led to growing instability, especially in the days since the pullout of U.S. military troops in mid-December.
The archbishop's concerns follow a series of incidents in the northern province of Kurdistan, which had been considered safe haven for Christians.
In Erbil, Kurdistan's capital, Christian Sermat Patros, 29 was kidnapped Dec. 12. Between Dec. 2 and Dec. 5, at least 30 Christian-owned businesses were torched in Zakho near the Turkish border. A Christian couple also was found shot dead in their car Dec. 13 in Mosul.
![]() |
Chaldean-Catholic Archbishop Louis Sako |
Chaldean Archbishop Louis Sako of Kirkuk in northern Iraq told the agency Aid to the Church in Need that Christians will spend Christmas in "great fear" because of the risk of new attacks.
All services and Masses have been scheduled for daylight hours, he said in an interview with Rome-based AsiaNews.
"Midnight Christmas Mass has been canceled in Baghdad, Mosul and Kirkuk as a consequence of the never-ending assassinations of Christians," he said, citing the Oct. 31, 2010, attack on the Syrian Catholic cathedral that left 57 people dead in the Iraqi capital.
Archbishop Sako also expressed concern over the growing conflict between Sunni and Shiite Muslims vying for political power. He said the conflict has led to growing instability, especially in the days since the pullout of U.S. military troops in mid-December.
The archbishop's concerns follow a series of incidents in the northern province of Kurdistan, which had been considered safe haven for Christians.
In Erbil, Kurdistan's capital, Christian Sermat Patros, 29 was kidnapped Dec. 12. Between Dec. 2 and Dec. 5, at least 30 Christian-owned businesses were torched in Zakho near the Turkish border. A Christian couple also was found shot dead in their car Dec. 13 in Mosul.
Happy Holdidays vs. Merry Christmas at a Catholic Parish?
From RealCatholicTV: It's enough to have to fight the anti-'Merry Christmas' crowd in the secular world, but to have to start fighting them in the parishes is something beyond the pale.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Archdiocese of Detroit has instructed a controversial conservative group to stop using the term “Catholic” to identify their television broadcasts.
The archdiocese has issued a statement reminding the faithful that canon law (#216) prohibits any apostolate “from claiming the name Catholic without the consent of the competent ecclesiastical authority.” The statement indicated that archdiocesan officials had informed RealCatholic TV and its director, Michael Voris, that “it does not regard them as being authorized to use the word ‘Catholic’ to identify or promote their public activities.”
“For some time, the Archdiocese of Detroit has been in communication with Mr. Michael Voris and his media partner at Real Catholic TV” regarding the name of their effort, the statement disclosed. Evidently the public announcement came after those contacts failed to produce a change in the name of the television apostolate.
RealCatholic TV is based in Ferndale, Michigan, within the bounds of the Detroit archdiocese. Its video presentations, featuring Voris in provocative commentaries on Catholic affairs, are distributed through the internet.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RealCatholic TV instructed not to use 'Catholic' name (Source: Catholic Culture)
The Archdiocese of Detroit has instructed a controversial conservative group to stop using the term “Catholic” to identify their television broadcasts.
The archdiocese has issued a statement reminding the faithful that canon law (#216) prohibits any apostolate “from claiming the name Catholic without the consent of the competent ecclesiastical authority.” The statement indicated that archdiocesan officials had informed RealCatholic TV and its director, Michael Voris, that “it does not regard them as being authorized to use the word ‘Catholic’ to identify or promote their public activities.”
“For some time, the Archdiocese of Detroit has been in communication with Mr. Michael Voris and his media partner at Real Catholic TV” regarding the name of their effort, the statement disclosed. Evidently the public announcement came after those contacts failed to produce a change in the name of the television apostolate.
RealCatholic TV is based in Ferndale, Michigan, within the bounds of the Detroit archdiocese. Its video presentations, featuring Voris in provocative commentaries on Catholic affairs, are distributed through the internet.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Congressmen cannot write “Merry Christmas” in official mail
Anonymous federal rulemakers this year decided that members of the U.S. House of Representatives are not allowed to wish their constituents back home “Merry Christmas.”
Senators may. However, members of the House may only offer holiday greetings to voters. They must steer clear of anything so politically incorrect as actually uttering the name of the federal holiday — which has been officially “Christmas” since 1870, when the House and Senate first gave the nation the day off to observe Christ’s birth.
Senators may. However, members of the House may only offer holiday greetings to voters. They must steer clear of anything so politically incorrect as actually uttering the name of the federal holiday — which has been officially “Christmas” since 1870, when the House and Senate first gave the nation the day off to observe Christ’s birth.
According to theWashington Examiner, the absurd ruling was made by nameless members of the Franking Commission, a bureaucracy which spends much of its time making, clarifying and re-writing rules in order to justify its existance. Staffers then apply the ever-changing rules, which only they understand, to outgoing mail from Representatives to approve whether each letter qualifies for “franking privileges” — free postage, one of the perks of being a member of Congress.
This year, Congressmen were told no holiday greetings, including “Merry Christmas,” could be sent.
This year, Congressmen were told no holiday greetings, including “Merry Christmas,” could be sent.
![]() |
| George and Laura Bush's 2007 Christmas card |
U.S. Representative Nick Rahall, a West Virginia Democrat on Wednesday urged the House Leadership to rein in the absurdity.
“This policy is just one more way political correctness is slowly dismantling the meaning of the Christmas season,” Rahall and other House members said in a letter to the House leadership. “The responsibility of the Franking Commission should not be to enforce political correctness. We are celebrating significant moments in two religions that have fundamentally shaped our Nation, and, as Members of Congress who represent thousands of constituents celebrating these holidays, we ask you to reconsider these outdated and restrictive rules.”
He pointed out the preposterous guidelines in which members were told they could make references in their official letters “to the season as a whole, using generic language” such as “have a safe and happy holiday season,” but that greetings such as “Merry Christmas” were banned.
Of particular irritation to Rahall is that Senators may use the traditional “Merry Christmas” greeting.
Rahall also is a co-sponsor of a House resolution that recognizes the importance of the symbols and traditions of Christmas and that strongly disapproves of attempts to ban references to Christmas.
“An American Christmas celebrates the simple majesty of the Christ child’s birth with humble candlelight church services full of song, gratitude and celebration, reflecting long held values and the faith of our fathers,” said Rahall. “although in recent years, this treasured holiday’s place among our Nation’s celebrations has been shaken.
“This policy is just one more way political correctness is slowly dismantling the meaning of the Christmas season,” Rahall and other House members said in a letter to the House leadership. “The responsibility of the Franking Commission should not be to enforce political correctness. We are celebrating significant moments in two religions that have fundamentally shaped our Nation, and, as Members of Congress who represent thousands of constituents celebrating these holidays, we ask you to reconsider these outdated and restrictive rules.”
He pointed out the preposterous guidelines in which members were told they could make references in their official letters “to the season as a whole, using generic language” such as “have a safe and happy holiday season,” but that greetings such as “Merry Christmas” were banned.
Of particular irritation to Rahall is that Senators may use the traditional “Merry Christmas” greeting.
Rahall also is a co-sponsor of a House resolution that recognizes the importance of the symbols and traditions of Christmas and that strongly disapproves of attempts to ban references to Christmas.
“An American Christmas celebrates the simple majesty of the Christ child’s birth with humble candlelight church services full of song, gratitude and celebration, reflecting long held values and the faith of our fathers,” said Rahall. “although in recent years, this treasured holiday’s place among our Nation’s celebrations has been shaken.
Eucharistic Adoration Revisited
SOURCE: Eastern Catholic Spiritual Renewal
A response to recent comment from the post Eucharistic Adoration( has no place in the East)
I know a Byzantine Catholic priest who was very concerned when some of his parishioners started going to a Roman Catholic church for a spiritual formation class. Not that learning is a bad thing but he did not believe that they were fully looking into their own tradition for spiritual formation. He said he would have to tell them to stop if he found out they were going to Eucharist Adoration. Why would he say such a thing?
First of all, when it comes to spiritual formation the Byzantine tradition is very different from the Latin tradition. So much so that it says in the Vatican II document Lumen Gentium (23) "By divine providence it has come about that various churches, established in various places by the apostles and their successors, have in the course of time coalesced into several groups, organically united, which, preserving the unity of faith and the unique divine constitution of the universal Church, enjoy their own discipline, their own liturgical usage, and their own theological and spiritual heritage." Our spiritual heritage that we receive in our churches does not come about simply by geographical origin but by the fact of divine providence. Consequently, we are under divine obligation to preserve and perpetuate what God gave us, even when it might be very different from our sister churches.
Based on this I would respond first to your comment that Christians of the Byzantine tradition are called to perpetuate the spiritual tradition and theological vision of their Eastern Fathers. Eucharistic Adoration as it is done in the Roman Catholic church is a reflection of the theological vision of the Latin tradition. This does not mean that we are without our own version of the practice. For example the Liturgy of the Presanctified. Also, just because we have our version does not mean that they are the same. What we do as "adoration" is a theological manifestation of how we received our tradition.
You mentioned in your comment that the practice of adoration is neither east or west. This statement is only partially accurate. Eucharistic Adoration is a universal concept in the church but by "divine providence" has been given the diverse expression that accords to each tradition. On the other hand, there really is no such things as spiritual property rights. Many saints of the East were fond of Latin practices but I might point out they practiced them in a way that nourished their traditions theological vision. This primarily is what I try to address in the post you commented on and in my blog. The fact is as Byzantine Catholic Christians we are called to renew the traditions of our Fathers and not replace them with the popular Latinizations of our day.
For all practical purposes, it's not an issue of what's East or West but rather the need to be true to who we are. Someone like St. John Chrysostom or St. Symeon should be able to recognize our churches as ones that shared the same traditions. In some cases the "Byzantine" tradition which they received and passed down is non-existent in some of our churches. In fact, this is one of the greatest stumbling blocks for church unity because many Eastern Orthodox look at our churches and can't recognize anything Byzantine. The call to be true to our tradition is really a struggle that Eastern Catholics must face or else continue to be as what we are called "Roman Catholics with Byzantine clothes on".
As far as your comment concerning "theology being important but ignoring the devotional life of the people" this understanding is far from an Byzantine understanding of theology. Theology and devotional life in the Byzantine tradition are one and the same. How we live and practice reflects our vision and understanding of God and there is no way to separate them. I know there is a saying that in the West they learn first and then believe and in the East we believe first then learn. In some respects you will find in a study of the theological traditions of the Latin west and Byzantine east that this saying is right on. For us Byzantine Christians there can be no real knowledge of God unless we repent because knowledge is experience. Consequently, our tradition is sometimes referred to as "mystical". This title comes from the idea that our spirituality is highly monastic. From this point we see that any theology or theologians proper called are tied to an experience of God rather then something or someone assonated with a university.
This brings me to my last point. You said the Divine Liturgy has no quiet time. Such a statement could only come from a failed catechesis. Every practice in the Byzantine tradition, especially the liturgy, is to lead us into hesychia "stillness". Based on this the Divine Liturgy is not noise but in fact what we will be doing for all eternity. Our tradition of Hesychasm which is the very essence of our spiritual tradition is not a part where there a quite time and then there other times for noise. I know in the Latin tradition such compartmentalization is used to categorize such things but not in our tradition. Through the Divine Liturgy we learn hesychia and become vessels of the Divine nature. In addition, every part of our life we learn to discover the stillness of Jesus Christ through ongoing repentance.
What we need to realize is just how harmful Eucharistic adoration of the Latin tradition has been to our Byzantine churches that have adopted it. Its unfortunate, that many of our liturgies have become nonexistent. So much so that Byzantine Catholics in order to fully celebrate the tradition of their fathers must go outside of their parishes to Orthodox churches just to celebrate vespers. One Byzantine Catholic priest pointed out that the reason why many won't come to our traditional Byzantine liturgical celebrations is because there is no communion or Eucharistic adoration. I mention this because the Latin traditions, such as Latin Eucharist adoration, have not in any way have been beneficial to our tradition. We have lost what the liturgy means and need to return to our roots. So I say again with full confidence that the Eucharistic Adoration of the Roman Catholic church has no place in our Byzantine church.
The comment I address can be found with other (here)
A response to recent comment from the post Eucharistic Adoration( has no place in the East)
I know a Byzantine Catholic priest who was very concerned when some of his parishioners started going to a Roman Catholic church for a spiritual formation class. Not that learning is a bad thing but he did not believe that they were fully looking into their own tradition for spiritual formation. He said he would have to tell them to stop if he found out they were going to Eucharist Adoration. Why would he say such a thing?
First of all, when it comes to spiritual formation the Byzantine tradition is very different from the Latin tradition. So much so that it says in the Vatican II document Lumen Gentium (23) "By divine providence it has come about that various churches, established in various places by the apostles and their successors, have in the course of time coalesced into several groups, organically united, which, preserving the unity of faith and the unique divine constitution of the universal Church, enjoy their own discipline, their own liturgical usage, and their own theological and spiritual heritage." Our spiritual heritage that we receive in our churches does not come about simply by geographical origin but by the fact of divine providence. Consequently, we are under divine obligation to preserve and perpetuate what God gave us, even when it might be very different from our sister churches.
Based on this I would respond first to your comment that Christians of the Byzantine tradition are called to perpetuate the spiritual tradition and theological vision of their Eastern Fathers. Eucharistic Adoration as it is done in the Roman Catholic church is a reflection of the theological vision of the Latin tradition. This does not mean that we are without our own version of the practice. For example the Liturgy of the Presanctified. Also, just because we have our version does not mean that they are the same. What we do as "adoration" is a theological manifestation of how we received our tradition.
You mentioned in your comment that the practice of adoration is neither east or west. This statement is only partially accurate. Eucharistic Adoration is a universal concept in the church but by "divine providence" has been given the diverse expression that accords to each tradition. On the other hand, there really is no such things as spiritual property rights. Many saints of the East were fond of Latin practices but I might point out they practiced them in a way that nourished their traditions theological vision. This primarily is what I try to address in the post you commented on and in my blog. The fact is as Byzantine Catholic Christians we are called to renew the traditions of our Fathers and not replace them with the popular Latinizations of our day.
For all practical purposes, it's not an issue of what's East or West but rather the need to be true to who we are. Someone like St. John Chrysostom or St. Symeon should be able to recognize our churches as ones that shared the same traditions. In some cases the "Byzantine" tradition which they received and passed down is non-existent in some of our churches. In fact, this is one of the greatest stumbling blocks for church unity because many Eastern Orthodox look at our churches and can't recognize anything Byzantine. The call to be true to our tradition is really a struggle that Eastern Catholics must face or else continue to be as what we are called "Roman Catholics with Byzantine clothes on".
![]() |
| Archbishop Elisey of Sourozh celebrated the Diocesan Liturgy of the Presanctified Gifts at the Cathedral of the Dormition of the Mother of God in London. |
This brings me to my last point. You said the Divine Liturgy has no quiet time. Such a statement could only come from a failed catechesis. Every practice in the Byzantine tradition, especially the liturgy, is to lead us into hesychia "stillness". Based on this the Divine Liturgy is not noise but in fact what we will be doing for all eternity. Our tradition of Hesychasm which is the very essence of our spiritual tradition is not a part where there a quite time and then there other times for noise. I know in the Latin tradition such compartmentalization is used to categorize such things but not in our tradition. Through the Divine Liturgy we learn hesychia and become vessels of the Divine nature. In addition, every part of our life we learn to discover the stillness of Jesus Christ through ongoing repentance.
What we need to realize is just how harmful Eucharistic adoration of the Latin tradition has been to our Byzantine churches that have adopted it. Its unfortunate, that many of our liturgies have become nonexistent. So much so that Byzantine Catholics in order to fully celebrate the tradition of their fathers must go outside of their parishes to Orthodox churches just to celebrate vespers. One Byzantine Catholic priest pointed out that the reason why many won't come to our traditional Byzantine liturgical celebrations is because there is no communion or Eucharistic adoration. I mention this because the Latin traditions, such as Latin Eucharist adoration, have not in any way have been beneficial to our tradition. We have lost what the liturgy means and need to return to our roots. So I say again with full confidence that the Eucharistic Adoration of the Roman Catholic church has no place in our Byzantine church.
The comment I address can be found with other (here)
Why are there two Christmases?
SOURCE: Winnipeg Free Press
By: Peter Drosdowech
My family celebrates two Christmases, and my grandchildren are now of an age to be asking: Why are there two?
I typed out my answer, of which I will give each of them a copy tonight. This is what they will read.
The story begins in 45 BC with Julius Caesar, who authorized the use of a calendar which became known as the Julian Calendar.
Until 1582, all Christians celebrated Christmas on Dec. 25.
During the 16th century, scientists and astronomers began telling the world that the calendar was 13 days "behind the sun."
In 1582, Pope Gregory, head of the Roman Catholic Church in Rome, authorized the use of a new calendar that moved the days ahead by 13 days, thus "catching up with the sun."
As the years and centuries went by, more and more countries accepted the new calendar, but at first only those where people belonged to the Roman Catholic Church.
In later years, countries with Protestant majorities opted for the new calendar. Thus, the new calendar became the choice for most of the people in the western part of that part of the world.
However, the Christian people in the eastern part of that part of the world who belonged to the Orthodox Church in Constantinople continued to use the Julian calendar and only in later years (the 19th and 20th centuries) adopted the Gregorian calendar for daily use and for civic purposes -- but not for religious holidays.
Since 1582, Christmas has been (and is) celebrated in Ukraine and by many Ukrainians all over the world on Jan. 7, as it is in Belarus, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Georgia, Greece, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Romania, Russia and Serbia.
In addition, Christmas is celebrated on Jan. 7 in countries where there is a high percentage of Orthodox followers: Albania, Bosnia Herzegovina, Estonia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia and Lebanon.
Although in Canada we often refer to Jan. 7 as "Ukrainian Christmas," the day is also celebrated by many others:
It is the day when people of the Orthodox faith all over the world -- and some Ukrainian Catholics in North America -- celebrate Christmas.
Peter Drosdowech is a Winnipeg grandfather.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
SOURCE: Hot Russian Brides
What is Russian Orthodox Christmas?
While the Western world is busy wrapping gifts and baking cookies for the Christmas holiday just days away, Orthodox Christians still have two more weeks to prepare.
The Russian Orthodox Church celebrates religious holidays according to the Julian calendar, which pre-dates the Gregorian calendar, so Christmas is celebrated on January 7th.
The History
After the Russian Revolution of 1917, the Bolsheviks banned Christmas celebrations. Many Christmas traditions, such as decorating a fir tree and giving presents, turned into New Year's traditions. Christmas became an official holiday and a non-labor day in Russia in 1991. It began regaining popularity only recently, partially because Russian leaders, starting with Vladimir Putin, annually attend a Christmas liturgy. However, the New Year still remains the more festive of the two celebrations.
How Russians Celebrate
People in Russia celebrate Christmas Day with activities such as having a family dinner, attending a special liturgy and visiting relatives and friends. There is a 40-day Lent preceding Christmas Day, when practicing Christians do not eat any meat. The Lent period ends with the first star in the night sky on January 6th – a symbol of Jesus Christ's birth. Many Orthodox Christians go to the church to attend a Christmas Eve liturgy.
The first star also signals the start of the Christmas Eve dinner, known as the Holy Supper. This ancient tradition can be traced back to pre-Christian times, though it is now a religious celebration honoring the birth and death of Jesus Christ. Twelve meatless dishes are prepared to represent the twelve apostles who shared the last meal with Christ. After dinner, young Russian girls engage in fortune telling traditions to learn more about their future husbands.
Symbolism
Symbols of the Russian Orthodox Christmas include Ded Moroz and Saint Nicholas. Ded Moroz is Russia’s Father Christmas or the Russian Santa Claus who delivers gifts to children at New Year celebrations. He’s usually accompanied by his granddaughter, the beautiful Snow Maiden. Saint Nicholas, who is the patron saint of Russia, sailors and children, represents the kind, good, and giving spirit of Christmas.
Other symbols include the white cloth used on dinner tables to represent purity and the cloth that baby Jesus was wrapped in. Straw may be placed on these tables to symbolize the simplicity of the place where Jesus was born. Also, candles are often lit to represent the light of Christ and the festive Christmas meal represents the end of fasting.
National Vacation Time
Orthodox Christmas is a national holiday in Russia so schools and most businesses are closed on January 7th. If Christmas Day falls on a weekend, the non-labor day moves to the following Monday. Russian authorities may sometimes declare a national vacation from January 1st to 10th due to the close proximity of New Year's, Christmas and the weekends between these two holidays.
The Old New Year
The New Year is another holiday often celebrated twice in Russia and Ukraine. The Orthodox New Year, also known as the Old New Year, is still informally observed on January 13th/14th. Usually not as festive as the New New Year on December 31st/January 1st, it serves as a nostalgic ending to the season with large meals, singing, and celebratory drinking. This holiday is interesting as it combines secular traditions of bringing in the New Year with Christian Orthodox customs of Christmastide, or the Twelve Days of Christmas.
By: Peter Drosdowech
My family celebrates two Christmases, and my grandchildren are now of an age to be asking: Why are there two?
I typed out my answer, of which I will give each of them a copy tonight. This is what they will read.
The story begins in 45 BC with Julius Caesar, who authorized the use of a calendar which became known as the Julian Calendar.
Until 1582, all Christians celebrated Christmas on Dec. 25.
During the 16th century, scientists and astronomers began telling the world that the calendar was 13 days "behind the sun."
In 1582, Pope Gregory, head of the Roman Catholic Church in Rome, authorized the use of a new calendar that moved the days ahead by 13 days, thus "catching up with the sun."
As the years and centuries went by, more and more countries accepted the new calendar, but at first only those where people belonged to the Roman Catholic Church.
In later years, countries with Protestant majorities opted for the new calendar. Thus, the new calendar became the choice for most of the people in the western part of that part of the world.
However, the Christian people in the eastern part of that part of the world who belonged to the Orthodox Church in Constantinople continued to use the Julian calendar and only in later years (the 19th and 20th centuries) adopted the Gregorian calendar for daily use and for civic purposes -- but not for religious holidays.
Since 1582, Christmas has been (and is) celebrated in Ukraine and by many Ukrainians all over the world on Jan. 7, as it is in Belarus, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Georgia, Greece, Macedonia, Moldova, Montenegro, Romania, Russia and Serbia.
In addition, Christmas is celebrated on Jan. 7 in countries where there is a high percentage of Orthodox followers: Albania, Bosnia Herzegovina, Estonia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia and Lebanon.
Although in Canada we often refer to Jan. 7 as "Ukrainian Christmas," the day is also celebrated by many others:
It is the day when people of the Orthodox faith all over the world -- and some Ukrainian Catholics in North America -- celebrate Christmas.
Peter Drosdowech is a Winnipeg grandfather.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
SOURCE: Hot Russian Brides
What is Russian Orthodox Christmas?
While the Western world is busy wrapping gifts and baking cookies for the Christmas holiday just days away, Orthodox Christians still have two more weeks to prepare.
The Russian Orthodox Church celebrates religious holidays according to the Julian calendar, which pre-dates the Gregorian calendar, so Christmas is celebrated on January 7th.
The History
After the Russian Revolution of 1917, the Bolsheviks banned Christmas celebrations. Many Christmas traditions, such as decorating a fir tree and giving presents, turned into New Year's traditions. Christmas became an official holiday and a non-labor day in Russia in 1991. It began regaining popularity only recently, partially because Russian leaders, starting with Vladimir Putin, annually attend a Christmas liturgy. However, the New Year still remains the more festive of the two celebrations.
![]() |
| Father Frost and Snegurochka |
People in Russia celebrate Christmas Day with activities such as having a family dinner, attending a special liturgy and visiting relatives and friends. There is a 40-day Lent preceding Christmas Day, when practicing Christians do not eat any meat. The Lent period ends with the first star in the night sky on January 6th – a symbol of Jesus Christ's birth. Many Orthodox Christians go to the church to attend a Christmas Eve liturgy.
The first star also signals the start of the Christmas Eve dinner, known as the Holy Supper. This ancient tradition can be traced back to pre-Christian times, though it is now a religious celebration honoring the birth and death of Jesus Christ. Twelve meatless dishes are prepared to represent the twelve apostles who shared the last meal with Christ. After dinner, young Russian girls engage in fortune telling traditions to learn more about their future husbands.
Symbolism
Symbols of the Russian Orthodox Christmas include Ded Moroz and Saint Nicholas. Ded Moroz is Russia’s Father Christmas or the Russian Santa Claus who delivers gifts to children at New Year celebrations. He’s usually accompanied by his granddaughter, the beautiful Snow Maiden. Saint Nicholas, who is the patron saint of Russia, sailors and children, represents the kind, good, and giving spirit of Christmas.
Other symbols include the white cloth used on dinner tables to represent purity and the cloth that baby Jesus was wrapped in. Straw may be placed on these tables to symbolize the simplicity of the place where Jesus was born. Also, candles are often lit to represent the light of Christ and the festive Christmas meal represents the end of fasting.
National Vacation Time
Orthodox Christmas is a national holiday in Russia so schools and most businesses are closed on January 7th. If Christmas Day falls on a weekend, the non-labor day moves to the following Monday. Russian authorities may sometimes declare a national vacation from January 1st to 10th due to the close proximity of New Year's, Christmas and the weekends between these two holidays.
The Old New Year
The New Year is another holiday often celebrated twice in Russia and Ukraine. The Orthodox New Year, also known as the Old New Year, is still informally observed on January 13th/14th. Usually not as festive as the New New Year on December 31st/January 1st, it serves as a nostalgic ending to the season with large meals, singing, and celebratory drinking. This holiday is interesting as it combines secular traditions of bringing in the New Year with Christian Orthodox customs of Christmastide, or the Twelve Days of Christmas.
Friday, December 23, 2011
Celebrating with the Hutsuls of the Carpathian Mountains
Source: CNEWA
text by Matthew Matuszak and Petro Didula
photographs by Petro Didula
I’ve traveled the world a bit and I have to say no one celebrates holidays quite like the Hutsuls,” says Yurii Prodoniuk, a resident of Kosmach, a village of 6,200.
Tucked into the Carpathian Mountains in southwestern Ukraine, Kosmach is the center of the 500,000-strong Greek Catholic and Orthodox Hutsul community.
The 13th-century Mongol invasion of Kievan Rus – which includes parts of present-day Belarus, Russia and Ukraine – is an essential chapter in Hutsul history. Many of those who survived the ruthless devastation of their homeland, peasants mostly, headed for the hills, seeking refuge in the Carpathians.
The earliest written references identifying these refugees as Hutsuls date to 14th- and early 15th-century Polish documents.The intensification of serfdom, which bound the peasants to the land, provoked another exodus to the mountains hundreds of years later.
Today, the descendants of these refugees live in an area covering 2,500 square miles in southwestern Ukraine and northern Romania.
“In general, the Hutsuls are conservative,” says Roman Kyrchiv, professor emeritus of philology at the Institute of Ukrainian Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. “It was difficult for them to accept Christianity. They were attached to their pre-Christian traditions.”
Christianity, in its Byzantine form, arrived in Kievan Rus with the baptism of its grand duke, Vladimir, in 988.
“There are remnants of pre-Christian pantheism in some Christmas carols,” Mr. Kyrchiv continues. Instead of referring to the infant Jesus, Mary, Joseph or the Magi, these carols simply recount village life and ask for prosperity for neighbors. To “Christianize” the carols, Hutsuls sometimes add a refrain after every verse, such as “O God, grant.”
For centuries church leaders sought to end the singing of these carols, Mr. Kyrchiv says. Bishop Hryhorii Khomyshyn, the Greek Catholic Bishop of Ivano-Frankivsk in the first half of the 20th century, advised that “Hutsul Christmas carols be rooted out.” But the head of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church from 1901 to 1944, Metropolitan Archbishop Andrey Sheptytsky of Lviv, thought otherwise, even writing a pastoral letter to the Hutsuls in their own distinctive dialect, which is similar to literary Ukrainian but with some Romanian influences.
Though for centuries geographically isolated, the Hutsuls were not insulated from the outside world. Depending on who governed the region and when (Catholic Poland and Austria to the west, Orthodox Russia to the east), Hutsuls, while true to their Byzantine Christian faith, were either Greek Catholic or Orthodox. “But this [jurisdictional divide] didn’t mean much to the people,” Mr. Kyrchiv says. Historically, Greek Catholics and Orthodox “celebrated religious feasts in each other’s churches.”
For centuries, Kosmach had but one parish, which was Greek Catholic, until the Soviets suppressed it in March 1946, forcing it to integrate with the Russian Orthodox Church.
Though deprived of its church, Kosmach’s Greek Catholic community survived; many celebrated the sacraments in secret while others participated in the Orthodox rite. This state of affairs lasted four decades, until the Soviet Union unraveled, the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church resurfaced and Ukraine achieved independence.
Today, mixed Greek Catholic and Orthodox Hutsul communities are the norm. But with proximity comes competition; this surfaces mainly during Theophany, the great feast of Christ’s baptism commemorated 12 days after Christmas. Both communities process to the river for the blessing of water.
“The Orthodox stand at one place for the blessing, but Greek Catholics go farther up the river so the Orthodox drink ‘Catholic’ water,” says longtime resident Mykhailo Didushytskyi. “I laugh and cry. Adults act like children. There’s a contest: The Orthodox want the Catholics to try the water first and vice versa.”
For the Hutsuls, however, tradition remains more important than denomination.
“They don’t listen to the priest,” says Father Vasylii Hunchak, pastor of the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox parish of Sts. Peter and Paul in Kosmach.
For example, Father Hunchak instructs his faithful that they can work on minor holy days. “They say, ‘the priest says that, but my mother says we can’t work,’” Father Hunchak continues. “Their beliefs are more important than what Christ handed down.”
“The Hutsuls are convinced this is how they avoid disaster,” Mr. Prodoniuk says. “They celebrate every minor holy day by not working the land. They celebrate not only St. Ann, St. Andrew and St. Nicholas, but St. Barbara and all the feasts of St. John,” he continues. “Misfortune doesn’t touch them. Other regions have floods, storms, earthquakes and other natural disasters. These pass by the Hutsuls.
“On holy days, the women don’t even use a knife,” Mr. Prodoniuk adds. “The day before the feast, they slice a lot of bread. They also make bread out of potatoes and corn, which can be broken by hand.”
The Soviets tried to modernize and socialize the Hutsuls with mixed results. Electricity may have been introduced, but collectivization failed. With a dearth of agricultural land, and with communities scattered throughout the Carpathians, logging and raising cattle and sheep remained the primary means of livelihood.
The Soviets frowned on tradition, particularly those traditions rooted in religion. But the Hutsuls took pride in their distinctive dress, dances and songs, says Vasyl Markus, editor of the Encyclopedia of the Ukrainian Diaspora and a professor at Loyola University in Chicago. Families continued to decorate Easter eggs, or pysanky, as well as practice embroidery and other examples of folk art. And unlike most parts of the Soviet Union, religious expression never really wavered. But that expression is not purely Christian.
“The Christian faith in the area is nuanced,” says Father Hunchak. “There is faith, but it is not exactly Christian, rather half-Christian, half-pagan … a mystical faith. In the Carpathian Mountains, there are people who know about trees, plants, nature.” The Hutsuls are intimately connected to nature, the elements and to their dead.
“Before Christmas Eve supper, people visit cemeteries,” says Mr. Didushytskyi. “They put candles on the graves of their relatives and invite them to come for supper. A place is then left at the table, with plate and utensils for a deceased relative, to show respect for the dead.”
Timing is important. “When the cattle are fed and the first star appears, we sit down at the table, light candles and pray,” Mr. Didushytskyi continues. “The eldest takes the kuttia [porridge made of wheat, honey, nuts and poppy seeds] and throws it on the ceiling with a spoon.” If the porridge sticks, this means God has blessed the family with health, cattle and fertile fields.
Caroling remains an important Christmas tradition. “According to legend, God gave gifts to all the countries,” says Father Hunchak, “Ukraine came late and God had nothing left to give except songs. Our Christmas carols are simply gifts from God.”
On Christmas Eve, grandchildren carol for their grandparents. On Christmas Day, older children carol. After that, however, only adult men who have permission from their pastors may carol. Proceeds from the singing – carolers receive “tips” – are donated to the parish.
“In some villages, first they sing to the man and woman of the house, then the cattle and the fields so that all will be healthy, they will have a good harvest and healthy animals,” says Mr. Didushytskyi.
“They can carol for a whole day at one house, if the man of the house provides enough food and drink. In the 1980’s some carolers came to Kosmach from another village to make more money,” he remembers. “At first people didn’t know the difference, but now they don’t give outsiders anything.”
But outside ways are making an impact on the Hutsuls; a dearth of job opportunities threatens the Hutsuls and their traditions.
“There’s no work in the village,” says a native of Kosmach, Anna Havryliuk. “Young people leave the country looking for work in the Czech Republic, Portugal and Italy.”
Still, even as they venture out into the world, the Hutsuls hang on to their traditions. On Christmas visits, Mrs. Havryliuk’s three grandchildren never fail to return to carol.
Matthew Matuszak is director of the Religious Information Service of Ukraine. Petro Didula handles public affairs for the Ukrainian Catholic University.
text by Matthew Matuszak and Petro Didula
photographs by Petro Didula
I’ve traveled the world a bit and I have to say no one celebrates holidays quite like the Hutsuls,” says Yurii Prodoniuk, a resident of Kosmach, a village of 6,200.
Tucked into the Carpathian Mountains in southwestern Ukraine, Kosmach is the center of the 500,000-strong Greek Catholic and Orthodox Hutsul community.
The 13th-century Mongol invasion of Kievan Rus – which includes parts of present-day Belarus, Russia and Ukraine – is an essential chapter in Hutsul history. Many of those who survived the ruthless devastation of their homeland, peasants mostly, headed for the hills, seeking refuge in the Carpathians.
The earliest written references identifying these refugees as Hutsuls date to 14th- and early 15th-century Polish documents.The intensification of serfdom, which bound the peasants to the land, provoked another exodus to the mountains hundreds of years later.
Today, the descendants of these refugees live in an area covering 2,500 square miles in southwestern Ukraine and northern Romania.
“In general, the Hutsuls are conservative,” says Roman Kyrchiv, professor emeritus of philology at the Institute of Ukrainian Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. “It was difficult for them to accept Christianity. They were attached to their pre-Christian traditions.”
Christianity, in its Byzantine form, arrived in Kievan Rus with the baptism of its grand duke, Vladimir, in 988.
“There are remnants of pre-Christian pantheism in some Christmas carols,” Mr. Kyrchiv continues. Instead of referring to the infant Jesus, Mary, Joseph or the Magi, these carols simply recount village life and ask for prosperity for neighbors. To “Christianize” the carols, Hutsuls sometimes add a refrain after every verse, such as “O God, grant.”
For centuries church leaders sought to end the singing of these carols, Mr. Kyrchiv says. Bishop Hryhorii Khomyshyn, the Greek Catholic Bishop of Ivano-Frankivsk in the first half of the 20th century, advised that “Hutsul Christmas carols be rooted out.” But the head of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church from 1901 to 1944, Metropolitan Archbishop Andrey Sheptytsky of Lviv, thought otherwise, even writing a pastoral letter to the Hutsuls in their own distinctive dialect, which is similar to literary Ukrainian but with some Romanian influences.
Though for centuries geographically isolated, the Hutsuls were not insulated from the outside world. Depending on who governed the region and when (Catholic Poland and Austria to the west, Orthodox Russia to the east), Hutsuls, while true to their Byzantine Christian faith, were either Greek Catholic or Orthodox. “But this [jurisdictional divide] didn’t mean much to the people,” Mr. Kyrchiv says. Historically, Greek Catholics and Orthodox “celebrated religious feasts in each other’s churches.”
For centuries, Kosmach had but one parish, which was Greek Catholic, until the Soviets suppressed it in March 1946, forcing it to integrate with the Russian Orthodox Church.
Though deprived of its church, Kosmach’s Greek Catholic community survived; many celebrated the sacraments in secret while others participated in the Orthodox rite. This state of affairs lasted four decades, until the Soviet Union unraveled, the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church resurfaced and Ukraine achieved independence.
Today, mixed Greek Catholic and Orthodox Hutsul communities are the norm. But with proximity comes competition; this surfaces mainly during Theophany, the great feast of Christ’s baptism commemorated 12 days after Christmas. Both communities process to the river for the blessing of water.
“The Orthodox stand at one place for the blessing, but Greek Catholics go farther up the river so the Orthodox drink ‘Catholic’ water,” says longtime resident Mykhailo Didushytskyi. “I laugh and cry. Adults act like children. There’s a contest: The Orthodox want the Catholics to try the water first and vice versa.”
For the Hutsuls, however, tradition remains more important than denomination.
“They don’t listen to the priest,” says Father Vasylii Hunchak, pastor of the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox parish of Sts. Peter and Paul in Kosmach.
For example, Father Hunchak instructs his faithful that they can work on minor holy days. “They say, ‘the priest says that, but my mother says we can’t work,’” Father Hunchak continues. “Their beliefs are more important than what Christ handed down.”
“The Hutsuls are convinced this is how they avoid disaster,” Mr. Prodoniuk says. “They celebrate every minor holy day by not working the land. They celebrate not only St. Ann, St. Andrew and St. Nicholas, but St. Barbara and all the feasts of St. John,” he continues. “Misfortune doesn’t touch them. Other regions have floods, storms, earthquakes and other natural disasters. These pass by the Hutsuls.
“On holy days, the women don’t even use a knife,” Mr. Prodoniuk adds. “The day before the feast, they slice a lot of bread. They also make bread out of potatoes and corn, which can be broken by hand.”
The Soviets tried to modernize and socialize the Hutsuls with mixed results. Electricity may have been introduced, but collectivization failed. With a dearth of agricultural land, and with communities scattered throughout the Carpathians, logging and raising cattle and sheep remained the primary means of livelihood.
The Soviets frowned on tradition, particularly those traditions rooted in religion. But the Hutsuls took pride in their distinctive dress, dances and songs, says Vasyl Markus, editor of the Encyclopedia of the Ukrainian Diaspora and a professor at Loyola University in Chicago. Families continued to decorate Easter eggs, or pysanky, as well as practice embroidery and other examples of folk art. And unlike most parts of the Soviet Union, religious expression never really wavered. But that expression is not purely Christian.
“The Christian faith in the area is nuanced,” says Father Hunchak. “There is faith, but it is not exactly Christian, rather half-Christian, half-pagan … a mystical faith. In the Carpathian Mountains, there are people who know about trees, plants, nature.” The Hutsuls are intimately connected to nature, the elements and to their dead.
“Before Christmas Eve supper, people visit cemeteries,” says Mr. Didushytskyi. “They put candles on the graves of their relatives and invite them to come for supper. A place is then left at the table, with plate and utensils for a deceased relative, to show respect for the dead.”
Timing is important. “When the cattle are fed and the first star appears, we sit down at the table, light candles and pray,” Mr. Didushytskyi continues. “The eldest takes the kuttia [porridge made of wheat, honey, nuts and poppy seeds] and throws it on the ceiling with a spoon.” If the porridge sticks, this means God has blessed the family with health, cattle and fertile fields.
Caroling remains an important Christmas tradition. “According to legend, God gave gifts to all the countries,” says Father Hunchak, “Ukraine came late and God had nothing left to give except songs. Our Christmas carols are simply gifts from God.”
On Christmas Eve, grandchildren carol for their grandparents. On Christmas Day, older children carol. After that, however, only adult men who have permission from their pastors may carol. Proceeds from the singing – carolers receive “tips” – are donated to the parish.
“In some villages, first they sing to the man and woman of the house, then the cattle and the fields so that all will be healthy, they will have a good harvest and healthy animals,” says Mr. Didushytskyi.
“They can carol for a whole day at one house, if the man of the house provides enough food and drink. In the 1980’s some carolers came to Kosmach from another village to make more money,” he remembers. “At first people didn’t know the difference, but now they don’t give outsiders anything.”
But outside ways are making an impact on the Hutsuls; a dearth of job opportunities threatens the Hutsuls and their traditions.
“There’s no work in the village,” says a native of Kosmach, Anna Havryliuk. “Young people leave the country looking for work in the Czech Republic, Portugal and Italy.”
Still, even as they venture out into the world, the Hutsuls hang on to their traditions. On Christmas visits, Mrs. Havryliuk’s three grandchildren never fail to return to carol.
Matthew Matuszak is director of the Religious Information Service of Ukraine. Petro Didula handles public affairs for the Ukrainian Catholic University.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






























