Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Vatican exhibition highlights Catholic roots of King James Bible

Vatican City, Feb 28, 2012 / 11:12 am (SOURCE: CNA/EWTN News).- A new interfaith exhibition that opens this week at the Vatican reveals how the roots of the 1611 King James Bible are almost entirely Catholic – despite the fact that the translation was often viewed as a highpoint of Protestant European culture.

“If it had not been for the Catholics of the 1500s there would be no King James Bible,” exhibition organizer Cary Summers told CNA.

“Many of the original bibles that formed the basis of the King James Bible came from Catholic priests. Very few changes were made. The ancient writings that the King James writers actually mimicked and copied were by Catholic priests,” he explained.




The “Verbum Domini” (Word of the Lord) exhibition runs from March 1 to April 15, coinciding with the seasons of Lent and Easter. The organizers describe it as a “highly contextual, interactive format” exhibit that aims to celebrate “the dramatic story of the Catholic contribution of the most-banned, most-debated, best-selling book of all time.”


They have also collected rare Jewish, Protestant and Orthodox artifacts to manifest a “shared love of God’s word” that exists among those religions. For that reason, the first room visitors enter is a scaled reproduction of the mid-third-century Synagogue of Dura Europos in Syria. Another exhibition highlight is the earliest known fragment of the book of Genesis, which comes from the Dead Sea Scrolls.

Summers gave CNA a preview tour of the exhibition on Feb. 22. The exhibition takes visitors through eight galleries, and concludes with a replica of the Jerusalem Chamber in London’s Westminster Abbey, the place where the King James Bible was completed 400 years ago.

“Most people don’t understand the history of the King James Bible. There is a rich history, a very positive history of Catholic contribution to the creation of it,” Summers said.

The King James Bible was commissioned by King James VI in 1604, only a year after the Scottish monarch ascended to the throne of England. A copy of the book was gifted to Pope Benedict XVI earlier this month by the current U.K. prime minister, David Cameron.

“The King James Bible has bequeathed a body of language that permeates every aspect of our culture and heritage, from everyday phrases to our greatest works of literature, music and art,” Cameron said in a speech to mark the 400th anniversary of the work in December 2011.

A recent study suggested that there are over 250 phrases and idioms in common English usage that have their origins in the language of the King James Bible. These include “how the mighty are fallen,” “the skin of my teeth,” “nothing new under the sun,” and “the salt of the earth.”

The Vatican exhibition hopes to show that all Christians can share the King James Bible in common.

“Unfortunately we live in a world that locks in on all the negatives, and that’s how it’s spun,” Summers remarked.“But there’s ... a rest of the story which is very positive, too. And that’s what we are here to celebrate.”

Six ways to avoid Lent (but it won’t be easy)

SOURCE: Catholic Register

Dr. Mary Marrocco is an associate secretary for the Canadian Council of Churches. She is also a teacher, writer and lay pastoral worker. Her column, Questioning Faith, features topics about the teachings of our church, scriptures, the lives and writings of the saints and spiritual writers and theologians. She can be reached at marrocco7@sympatico.ca.


Lent this year has been going on for a while now, but it’s not too late to get around it. For those reluctant to join with the many who are making a Lenten sacrifice and are instead looking for reliable methods to escape Lent, I offer six suggestions. Use at your own pace.

1. Don’t enter a church. Lent is everywhere in there these days, in the words, the music, the smells, the wall hangings. Even if you do happen to wander into a church or two, there are still ways to avoid Lent while inside, including the techniques listed below.


2. Stop praying. This includes not only the deep, rich, gift-kind of prayer, when we profoundly feel God’s presence, but also rote prayer and prayers that seem to come only from the lips. That seemingly superficial kind of prayer — the one that we stay faithful to even when we can’t seem to find or feel God at all, when we feel only pain, or when we’re provided no felt reward and no sense of success — has a hidden but decisive power. So if you are fleeing Lent, you’d better flee all kinds of prayer. (This is especially effective when combined with one or more of the other five.)

3. Think only of yourself. We have multiple methods at our disposal. We can even disguise that this is what we’re doing and imagine we are thinking of others when our attention is wholly absorbed by ourselves.

4. Use all your willpower to follow the Church’s Lenten rules to the letter, relying completely on yourself, as though God doesn’t exist, or you were God.

5. Pretend you don’t have a body. It’s a good trick to know, since some think eschewing the body is the best way to dive into Lent, rather than to get around it. They know that Lent is profoundly mystical, fashioned to bring the heart and soul closer to God, their source and goal. But they forget that it’s also terribly physical; for humans aren’t pure spirit (as the angels are), nor pure animal. So if we’re to come into the life of the Trinity, our bodies must be part of the journey. That’s why so much about Lent is designed to help us encounter the body and to bring body and soul closer to their original unity.
 
Lent helps prepare us for our return to Paradise, or rather our ultimate entry into God’s Kingdom. In its original state of innocence (as John Paul II reminded us in his theology of the body, audience number 28), the body was subordinated to and united with the spirit. In our present state, the body is a “centre of resistance” to the spirit, as we experience daily in a thousand ways. The Lenten invitation to encounter the body is an invitation to receive Christ’s gift of the restoration of all things — including the body-spirit unity. By accepting this invitation, we re-taste the Paradise of Adam and Eve. (Some eastern monks never eat meat, as a way of living Paradise, where no one needs to kill in order to sustain life.) At the same time, we foretaste the Kingdom of God into which Christ invites us. Living these 40 days as though the body weren’t involved is an especially sophisticated method of avoiding Lent.


6. Hide from yourself all grief, sadness, loneliness, anger, despair, hunger, longing, fear, thirst, emptiness, pettiness, selfishness, lust and yearning you have ever felt; seal them in a locked mental chamber and stay away. (For those who wish to try the advanced version, take care also to hide joy, kindness, delight and sweetness; go around throughout Lent with a sombre, stern face.)

If Lent involves encountering the body, how much more does it mean entering into our own heart? As God spoke to the prophet Hosea: “I will seduce her, and lead her into the wilderness, and there speak to her heart.” By refusing to enter into the wilderness of our hearts, we can postpone, if not completely avoid, the Lenten trek. We may be adept, already, at locking ourselves out of these “dark” places in our hearts — the kind Jesus deliberately entered into when the Spirit led Him into the desert for 40 days (the model of our 40-day Lent), with the devil as tempting company. By inviting us into the Lenten desert wilderness, the Church asks us to enter these inner places, trusting that Christ will meet us there. After all, He descended into Hell and harrowed it; so if He asks us to remain in our darkness rather than running away, it’s because that’s where the Resurrection will happen. If we avoid going there, how will we know the Resurrection?

Avoiding Lent might not be so easy, or so desirable, after all.

Patriarch Sviatoslav: ‘To fast is above all to abstain from sin, bad habits and passions’

“We should remember that to fast does not mean only to limit oneself in food and entertainment. To fast is above all to abstain from sin, bad habits and passions. It is also a rejection of indifference, evil thoughts and selfishness. The Great Lent is an invitation for each of us, wounded with sins, burdened with infirmities and exhausted by daily chores, to rush into the arms of the Lord,” explains Patriarch Sviatoslav (Shevchuk), head of the UGCC, in his Lenten Pastoral Message.

In the letter, the head of the UGCC indicates the following elements of the Great Lent: repentance and penance, prayer, and alms.

His Beatitude Sviatoslav says that Lent is a time of intense prayer. “Refraining from entertainment during this time, we also have to devote more attention to communication with God: through participation in Lenten services in church, and through longer and more zealous prayer in the family and alone,” says the Primate.

Blessed Sviatoslav also speaks of works of mercy, which he calls “an essential condition of the Lenten spiritual journey.”

In conclusion, His Beatitude Sviatoslav wished that Lent gave all “a renewed spiritual life, awakening of Christian zeal, and love for God and thy neighbour in our parish communities and monastic cloisters.”


Medical-ethics journal proposes acceptance of infanticide

SOURCE:  Catholic Culture

The Journal of Medical Ethics has published an article calling for acceptance of “after-birth abortion”—the destruction of unwanted children after they are born.

The article--written by two ethicists with university affiliations in Australia, Italy, and England—argues that since abortion is now accepted, infanticide should also be allowed, since “both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons.” The authors recognize babies—born or unborn—as “potential persons,” but find that status “morally irrelevant.” 

Additional sources for this story
Some links will take you to other sites, in a new window.

UOC-MP Already Considers Itself Lawful Owner of Pochaiv Monastery

SOURCE:  RISU

A deputy of the Party of Regions, Vasyl Horbal, who was the author of Bill 9690 “On Restitution of Objects of Cultural Heritage to Religious Organizations” registered on 12 January, 2012, assured that the bill has good chances to be passed by the Parliament. He said so at a press-conference “Will the Pochaiv Monastery be returned to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church?” on 24 February. So reported Orthodoxy in Ukraine.

The event was also attended by the Superior of the Pochaiv Monastery, Archbishop Volodymyr (Moroz) of Pochaiv of UOC-MP, the Press Secretary of the Head of UOC-MP, Protopriest Heorhii Kovalenko and the soloist of the Karamazov Brothers rock band, Oleh Karamazov. They unanimously stated that the return of the Pochaiv Monastery and Kremenets Monastery of UOC-MP is the restoration of historical justice.

Horbal stated that the Cabinet of Ministers received an instruction to settle the issue of the transfer of the objects in Kremenets District, the Women’s Monastery of Epiphany of Ternopil Eparchy and Pochaiv Monastery to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and objects in Kyiv to the Kyiv Cave Monastery without the right of alienation and change of intended purposes of use thereof. The deputy assured that there are good prospects for the bill. According to him, the list of objects of cultural heritage can be even enlarged as it is referred to by representatives of other religious organizations who also raise the question regarding the return to the religious organizations of the religious buildings confiscated under the Soviet regime.

Archbsihop Volodymyr (Moroz) of Pochaiv of UOC-MP noted that after the collapse of USSR, religious buildings were returned to all denominations except UOC-MP. Therefore, he calls the return of the Pochaiv Monastery to his denomination restoration of historical justice.

“In Ternopil Region, as of 1 January, 2003, 669 churches were returned to UGCC, of which 264 are monuments of historical significance. Wooden monuments of historical and cultural significance, such as the Cathedral of St. Yuri, Monastery of St. Onufrii, Cathedral of Transfiguration, Church of St. Andrew and a number of other churches and buildings, were transferred to the Greek Catholic community in Lviv. Nobody disputed it or held any public hearings. At the same time, the buildings of the Lavra [editor: Pochaiv Monastery] were included in the Kremenets-Pochaiv State Historic and Architectural Reserve, from which it managed to secede in 2003 with God’s help,” said the Superior of the Pochaiv Monastery.

Protopriest Heorhii Kovalenko
The Press Secretary of the Head of UOC-MP, Protopriest Heorhii Kovalenko reminded that all over the world, Church property has been in the ownership of the community and the Church for a long time and that UOC has not been granted the status of a legal person so far. The soloist of the Karamazov Brothers group, Oleh Karamazov said that he is ashamed to participate in a discussion regarding the return of the Pochaiv Monastery to the Church as Church property should belong to the Church.

As RISU reported earlier, Bill 9690 provoked many discussions in the society. For instance, the Head of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, Patriarch Sviatoslav (Shevchuk) stated that the procedure of the return of the Church property in Ukraine should be conducted very carefully, without showing favoritism with respect to any denomination.

“As for the transfer of religious buildings to the ownership of any denomination, as I said repeatedly, one should not do it showing favouritism to any denomination, for both the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church were harmed by the Communist regime,” stated Patriarch Sviatoslav.

According to him the transfer of Church buildings should be carried out transparently and with taking into account the interests of all the denominations.

Patriarch Filaret of UOC-Kyivan Patriarchate is also against the bill. He even forwarded a letter to President Yanukovych expressing his concern about the possible privatization by Moscow of the Ukrainian shrines, the Kyiv Cave and Pochaiv Monasteries. He warned Ukraine’s President that approval of the bill may result in deterioration of the inter-denominational relations.

The bill also provoked discontent of the movement “Ukrainian shrines to Ukrainian nation.”

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

More Wisdom from +Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen



“The first direct, human limitation of infant life in the history of Christianity took place in the village of Bethlehem through an infant-controller whose name was Herod. The prevention of infant life was simultaneously an attack upon Divinity in the person of God made man, Jesus Christ our Lord. 

No one strikes at birth who does not simultaneously strike at God, for birth is earth’s reflection of the Son’s eternal generation.”
 
+Archbishop Fulton Sheen

How Would St. Germanus Site Your Church?

Church could be forced to 'give up' public work, Cardinal George warns

Chicago, Ill., Feb 28, 2012 / 12:18 am (SOURCE: CNA/EWTN News).- The Obama administration is effectively telling Catholics to abandon their work in the public square, according to Chicago's Cardinal Francis E. George.

This year, the Catholic Church in the United States is being told she must 'give up' her health care institutions, her universities and many of her social service organizations. This is not a voluntary sacrifice,” warned the cardinal and former president of the U.S. Catholic bishops' conference.

In his Feb. 26 Catholic New World column, the cardinal said these public ministries may come to an end because of the “much-discussed Department of Health and Human Services regulations now filed and promulgated for implementation beginning Aug. 1 of this year.”

The rules in question, formulated as part of federal health care reform, force many religious institutions to provide employees with contraception, sterilization, and abortion-causing drugs, without a co-pay through their health care plans.

Unless the rule is halted, Cardinal George said, institutions may be forced to choose between dropping their religious identity or abandoning their work.

He offered a striking picture of “what will happen if the HHS regulations are not rescinded.”

The Choices

“A Catholic institution, so far as I can see right now, will have one of four choices,” he explained.

The first would be to “secularize itself, breaking its connection to the church, her moral and social teachings and the oversight of its ministry by the local bishop.”

The second choice would involve paying “exorbitant annual fines to avoid paying for insurance policies that cover abortifacient drugs, artificial contraception and sterilization. This is not economically sustainable.”

A ministry's only other choices would involve transferring ownership to a non-Catholic group or the government – or shutting down altogether.

In his column, Cardinal George also argued against tactics he said were being used to marginalize the Church in its opposition to the contraception mandate.

One such argument claims that “the majority of Catholics use artificial contraception,” and Church institutions should therefore be forced to provide it to employees.

But this argument assumes that the moral law should conform to human behavior, rather than the other way around.

Behavior doesn’t determine morality. If it can be shown that a majority of Catholic students cheat on their exams, it is still wrong to cheat on exams. Trimming morality to how we behave guts the Gospel call to conversion of life and rejection of sin.”

Advocates of the contraception mandate also call attention to some Catholics' disagreement with Church teaching.

Cardinal George noted that there have “always been those whose personal faith is not adequate to the faith of the Church.” But this does not change the fact that bishops “are the successors of the apostles; they collectively receive the authority to teach and govern that Christ bestowed upon the apostles.”

The bishops, he said, speak “for the Catholic and apostolic faith. Those who hold that faith gather with them; others go their own way. They are and should be free to do so, but they deceive themselves and others in calling their organizations Catholic.”


The cardinal invited the Catholic laity, and other concerned citizens, to “step back and understand what is happening to our country as the church is despoiled of her institutions and as freedom of conscience and of religion become a memory from a happier past.”

“The suffering being imposed on the church and on society now is not a voluntary penance. We should both work and pray to be delivered from it.”

Monday, February 27, 2012

The Lenten Prayer of St Ephrem the Syrian

By Protopresbyter Alexander Schmemann

Of all Lenten hymns and prayers, one short prayer can be termed the Lenten prayer. Tradition ascribes it to one of the great teachers of spiritual life - St. Ephrem the Syrian. Here is its text:

O Lord and Master of my life,
take from me the spirit of sloth, despair, lust for power, and idle talk


But give rather the spirit of chastity, humility, patience, and love to your servant


Yes, O Lord and King, grant me to see my own transgressions
and not to judge my brother,
for blessed are you for ages of ages. Amen.

This prayer is read twice at the end of each Lenten service Monday through Friday (not on Saturdays and Sundays for, as we shall see later, the services of these days do not follow the Lenten pattern). At the first reading, a prostration follows each petition. Then we all bow twelve times saying: "O God, cleanse me a sinner." The entire prayer is repeated with one final prostration at the end.

Why does this short and simple prayer occupy such an important position in the entire Lenten worship? Because it enumerates in a unique way all the "negative" and "positive" elements of repentance and constitutes, so to speak, a "check list" for our individual Lenten effort. This effort is aimed first at our liberation from some fundamental spiritual diseases which shape our life and make it virtually impossible for us even to start turning ourselves to God.

The basic disease is sloth. It is that strange laziness and passivity of our entire being which always pushes us "down" rather than "up" -- which constantly convinces us that no change is possible and therefore desirable. It is in fact a deeply rooted cynicism which to every spiritual challenge responds "what for?" and makes our life one tremendous spiritual waste. It is the root of all sin because it poisons the spiritual energy at its very source.

The result of sloth is faint-heartedness (despair). It is the state of despondency which all spiritual Fathers considered the greatest danger for the soul. Despondency is the impossibility for man to see anything good or positive; it is the reduction of everything to negativism and pessimism. It is truly a demonic power in us because the Devil is fundamentally a liar. He lies to man about God and about the world; he fills life with darkness and negation. Despondency is the suicide of the soul because when man is possessed by it he is absolutely unable to see the light and to desire it.

Lust of power! Strange as it may seem, it is precisely sloth and despondency that fill our life with lust of power. By vitiating the entire attitude toward life and making it meaningless and empty, they force us to seek compensation in, a radically wrong attitude toward other persons. If my life is not oriented toward God, not aimed at eternal values, it will inevitably become selfish and self-centered and this means that all other beings will become means of my own self-satisfaction. If God is not the Lord and Master of my life, then I become my own lord and master -- the absolute center of my own world, and I begin to evaluate everything in terms of my needs, my ideas, my desires, and my judgments. The lust of power is thus a fundamental depravity in my relationship to other beings, a search for their subordination to me. It is not necessarily expressed in the actual urge to command and to dominate "others." It may result as well in indifference, contempt, lack of interest, consideration, and respect. It is indeed sloth and despondency directed this time at others; it completes spiritual suicide with spiritual murder.

Finally, idle talk. Of all created beings, man alone has been endowed with the gift of speech. All Fathers see in it the very "seal" of the Divine Image in man because God Himself is revealed as Word (John, 1:1). But being the supreme gift, it is by the same token the supreme danger. Being the very expression of man, the means of his self-fulfillment, it is for this very reason the means of his fall and self-destruction, of betrayal and sin. The word saves and the word kills; the word inspires and the word poisons. The word is the means of Truth and it is the means of demonic Lie. Having an ultimate positive power, it has therefore a tremendous negative power. It truly creates positively or negatively. When deviated from its divine origin and purpose, the word becomes idle. It "enforces" sloth, despondency, and lust of power, and transforms life into hell. It becomes the very power of sin.

These four are thus the negative "objects" of repentance. They are the obstacles to be removed. But God alone can remove them. Hence, the first part of the Lenten prayer; this cry from the bottom of human helplessness. Then the prayer moves to the positive aims of repentance which also are four.







Chastity! If one does not reduce this term, as is so often and erroneously done, only to its sexual connotations, it is understood as the positive counterpart of sloth. The exact and full translation of the Greek sofrosini and the Russian tselomudryie ought to be whole-mindedness. Sloth is, first of all, dissipation, the brokenness of our vision and energy, the inability to see the whole. Its opposite then is precisely wholeness. If we usually mean by chastity the virtue opposed to sexual depravity, it is because the broken character of our existence is nowhere better manifested than in sexual lust -- the alienation of the body from the life and control of the spirit. Christ restores wholeness in us and He does so by restoring in us the true scale of values by leading us back to God.

The first and wonderful fruit of this wholeness or chastity is humility. We already spoke of it. It is above everything else the victory of truth in us, the elimination of all lies in which we usually live. Humility alone is capable of truth, of seeing and accepting things as they are and therefore of seeing God's majesty and goodness and love in everything. This is why we are told that God gives grace to the humble and resists the proud.

Chastity and humility are naturally followed by patience. The "natural" or "fallen" man is impatient, for being blind to himself he is quick to judge and to condemn others. Having but a broken, incomplete, and distorted knowledge of everything, he measures all things by his tastes and his ideas. Being indifferent to everyone except himself, he wants life to be successful right here and now. Patience, however, is truly a divine virtue. God is patient not because He is "indulgent," but because He sees the depth of all that exists, because the inner reality of things, which in our blindness we do not see, is open to Him. The closer we come to God, the more patient we grow and the more we reflect that infinite respect for all beings which is the proper quality of God.

Finally, the crown and fruit of all virtues, of all growth and effort, is love -- that love which, as we have already said, can be given by God alone-the gift which is the goal of all spiritual preparation and practice.

All this is summarized and brought together in the concluding petition of the Lenten prayer in which we ask "to see my own errors and not to judge my brother." For ultimately there is but one danger: pride. Pride is the source of evil, and all evil is pride. Yet it is not enough for me to see my own errors, for even this apparent virtue can be turned into pride. Spiritual writings are full of warnings against the subtle forms of pseudo-piety which, in reality, under the cover of humility and self-accusation can lead to a truly demonic pride. But when we "see our own errors" and "do not judge our brothers," when, in other terms, chastity, humility, patience, and love are but one in us, then and only then the ultimate enemy--pride--will be destroyed in us.

After each petition of the prayer we make a prostration. Prostrations are not limited to the Prayer of St. Ephrem but constitute one of the distinctive characteristics of the entire Lenten worship. Here, however, their meaning is disclosed best of all. In the long and difficult effort of spiritual recovery, the Church does not separate the soul from the body. The whole man has fallen away from God; the whole man is to be restored, the whole man is to return. The catastrophe of sin lies precisely in the victory of the flesh -- the animal, the irrational, the lust in us -- over the spiritual and the divine. But the body is glorious; the body is holy, so holy that God Himself "became flesh." Salvation and repentance then are not contempt for the body or neglect of it, but restoration of the body to its real function as the expression and the life of spirit, as the temple of the priceless human soul. Christian asceticism is a fight, not against but for the body. For this reason, the whole man - soul and body - repents. The body participates in the prayer of the soul just as the soul prays through and in the body. Prostrations, the "psycho-somatic" sign of repentance and humility, of adoration and obedience, are thus the lenten rite par excellence.

Metropolitan Volodymyr: Honesty of Archbishop Oleksandr Is Undoubted

SOURCE:  RISU

Metropolitan Volodymyr, the head of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church-Moscow Patriarchate, said in an interview to the newspaper Dzerkalo Tyzhnia that he does not question the honesty of his secretary, Archbishop Oleksandr (Drabynko). RISU’s Ukrainian-language web page posted this story on February 25.

In answer to the question about the dismissal of Archbishop Oleksandr from his position, exclusion from the Synod and accusations "of artificial opposing of the Holy Synod of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church to its Head, which is slander against the collective mind of the Church and blasphemy against the Holy Spirit," Metropolitan Volodymyr said:

"Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is a very serious thing. One must not fling about such phrases. It is beneath criticism. One must not trifle with such things.

"As for his dismissal from his position, the Synod has decreed so. The Synod has a right to decide his fate in the interests of the church.

"My personal attitude to that person has not changed. I have known him for a very long time. He has done a lot of laudable things for the church despite his young age, and I believe he will do more. His honesty is undoubted."

 Щоб читач міг одержати максимально об’єктивну картину того, що відбувається в Українській православній церкві, ми звернулися до митрополита Володимира з проханням про інтерв’ю.
Учора предстоятель УПЦ МП поговорив з кореспондентом DT.UA

— Владико, нещодавно відбулося засідання Священного Синоду Української православної церкви. Відбулося всупереч вашій забороні. Як стверджують, дехто навіть поставив під сумнів автентичність вашого листа. З огляду на це, як віруючі мають ставитися до рішень Синоду? 
 — Так, я писав, що мене турбують деякі питання, пов’язані з діяльністю церкви. Що мене турбує майбутнє церкви, що вона повинна стати церквою, яка насправді має вести людей до спасіння. 

Є проблеми, котрі стосуються структури управління церквою. Незгоди в церкві можуть бути, бо йдеться про живих людей. Але церква має стояти вище цього.

Не так давно відбувся Собор Української православної церкви, на якому вирішувалися питання стосунків між церквою і державою. На Соборі ієрархи звітували про свою діяльність, про свої справи. Собор пройшов у братерському дусі, хоча були люди, які хотіли його зірвати. Але Собор відбувся успішно, хвалити Бога. Незважаючи на те, що можуть траплятися (і це закономірно) непорозуміння між ієрархами, навіть між головою церкви та членами її. 

Що стосується останніх подій. Відмінності у наших виступах не є показником розколу, це є прояв волі Божої. Йшлося не про те, що хтось не згодний із діями церкви або хтось не згодний із ідеологією церкви. Я не виступаю проти церкви чи проти Священного Синоду. Я за те, щоб покращилася структура. Щоб було більше демократії. Щоб церква знаходила спільні бажання, устремління. 

Людям треба дати серйозну відповідь — у що ми віруємо, і як ми віруємо. 

— Священний Синод відсторонив вашого особистого секретаря, архієпископа Олександра від посади голови Відділу зовнішніх церковних зв’язків та вивів його зі складу Священного Синоду. Під час засідання йому закидали, що він «штучно протиставляє Священний Синод Української Православної Церкви її Предстоятелю, що є наклепом на соборний розум Церкви і хулою на Духа Святого». 
 — Хула на Духа Святого — це дуже серйозно. Не можна кидатися такими фразами. Це не витримує ніякої критики. З такими речами жартувати не можна. 
Стосовно усунення з посади… Синод призначив, Синод має право розпорядитися його долею в інтересах церкви. 

Моє особисте ставлення до цієї людини не змінилося. Я її знаю дуже давно. Вона багато похвального зробила для церкви, незважаючи на молоді роки, і вірю, що ще багато зробить. У його чесності нема сумнівів. 

 — Це було таємне голосування. Рішення ухвалювалося з урахуванням богословської освіти, авторитету.

— З огляду на те, що нині УПЦ керують люди, котрі не бачать сенсу в автономії церкви, яким може бути її найближче майбутнє?
 — Майбутнє буде гідним, дасть Бог. По наших гріхах та по наших заслугах. Воно буде залежати й від того, як церква впорається з актуальними питаннями, які перед нею ставляться суспільством. Воно буде залежати від того, як кожен із нас, віруючих людей, буде поводити себе, відповідно до свого звання, до свого покликання. 
Стосовно автономії. Багато розмов ведеться про можливу автокефалію, але офіційно питання про кінцеве рішення не ставилося. Це не означає, що церква забороняє на цю тему говорити. 

Питання автокефалії особливо важливе для Західної України, де є своя історія церкви і Вітчизни. Але треба розуміти, що за цим стоятимуть нові проблеми, ціла низка питань, пов’язаних зі структурою управління, розподілом влади. 

Помісні православні церкви пройшли певний шлях. Ми його теж проходимо. Ми мусимо слухати думки людей. Господь підтримує правду. Відіграє роль наша віра, наша християнська надія. 

— Наскільки можливим є об’єднання православних конфесій? 
 — Все можливе, все в руках Божих. Думаю, що час покаже. Але ми повинні дивитися на це питання з точки зору християнської відповідальності. Церкву не можна міняти, як ми міняємо наші світські установи. Церкву установив Господь, він її береже. 
Зараз добиватися автокефалії чи автономії, з огляду на ту суміш, що є в нас в Україні, важко, небезпечно, я вважаю, що на сьогодні — й не потрібно. 

— Наскільки серйозний ризик перетворення УПЦ з достатньо автономної церкви на фактичну складову РПЦ? 
 — Я не думаю, що є такий яскраво виражений ризик. Але православні повинні берегти свою віру, стояти на сторожі. А церква в надійних руках, вона в руках Божих.
  
— Свого часу ви виправдовували балотування намісника Києво-Печерської Лаври отця Павла до Київради. Тепер вам не здається, що згода церкви на його кандидування була помилкою? 
— Я стояв на тому, що це — не церковне діло, церква не може брати участь у громадянських заходах, особливо таких, як вибори. Цього треба боятися. Мене критикували на засіданні Синоду, що я не хочу допомогти церкві. Мені говорили, що треба дружити з владою, навіть бути членами влади, для того, щоб церква могла сказати своє слово з державної трибуни, чи то місцевої, чи всеукраїнської. 
Свого часу ми на Синоді прийняли рішення, що церква від політичних справ від’єднується. Але довелося піти на поступки, бо багато хто в нашій церкві вважав, що треба дозволити, треба спробувати. От, спробували. Думаю, нічого особливого це не дало.

— Стверджують, буцімто патріарх Кирил поставив під сумнів вашу дієздатність. Вам доводилося чути про це?
 — Офіційно це не було ніде надруковано, це не було підтверджено ні політичними діячами, ні церковними. Є люди, яких цікавлять якісь інтриги, новини, пов’язані з інтригами. 

— Свого часу Любомир Гузар добровільно пішов із посади першої особи УГКЦ, убезпечивши церкву від проблем, пов’язаних із правонаступництвом. Чи не думали ви про такий сценарій? Чи є люди, котрим би ви могли добровільно передати керівництво церквою? 
 — Питання непросте. Але це життя. Є, звичайно, люди в нашій церкві, яким можна було б це довірити… Думаю, знайдеться людина. Свято место пусто не бывает.

— Чи загрожує УПЦ розкол?
 — Розкол може статися. Він може статися, якщо хтось його спровокує. Але розкол не станеться без волі Божої. Я вірю твердо, що Господь буде нашим захисником. Життя церкви має свої підводні рифи, воно час від часу дає причини хвилюватися. Але вірую, що Господь з нами. 

Днями я збираюся звернутися до пастви з нагоди початку Посту, аби сказати про значення Посту в житті людей. Донести до людей, що Бог не покидає нашу церкву.

Moscow Cossacks to protect Orthodox churches from hooligans

Moscow, February 27, Interfax - Moscow Cossacks have made a decision to organize guards near churches in southeastern Moscow in response to a recent hooligan act in the Cathedral of Christ the Savior, the press service for the prefecture of the Moscow Southeastern District told Interfax on Monday.

"There will be voluntary Cossack brigades near every church in southeastern Moscow. Cossacks launched an initiative entitled "Protect Orthodox Holy Places!" following an incident that occurred in the Moscow Cathedral of Christ the Savior in February," the press service has reported.

The incident in question occurred on February 21, when five girls wearing protective masks approached the altar in the Cathedral of Christ the Savior and insulted the clergy and believers, including the patriarch of all Russia, for 2-3 minutes. The incident outraged representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church and believers. (See original story HERE)

Forgiveness Vespers - The Start of the Great Fast

Forgiveness Sunday
Father Alexander Schmemann
 

In the Orthodox Church, the last Sunday before Great Lent – the day on which, at Vespers, Lent is liturgically announced and inaugurated – is called Forgiveness Sunday. On the morning of that Sunday, at the Divine Liturgy, we hear the words of Christ:

"If you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you, but if you forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses..." (Mark 6:14-15)

Then after Vespers – after hearing the announcement of Lent in the Great Prokeimenon: "Turn not away Thy face from Thy child for I am afflicted! Hear me speedily! Draw near unto my soul and deliver it!", after making our entrance into Lenten worship, with its special memories, with the prayer of St. Ephraim the Syrian, with its prostrations – we ask forgiveness from each other, we perform the rite of forgiveness and reconciliation. And as we approach each other with words of reconciliation, the choir intones the Paschal hymns, filling the church with the anticipation of Paschal joy.


What is the meaning of this rite? Why is it that the Church wants us to begin Lenten season with forgiveness and reconciliation? These questions are in order because for too many people Lent means primarily, and almost exclusively, a change of diet, the compliance with ecclesiastical regulations concerning fasting. They understand fasting as an end in itself, as a "good deed" required by God and carrying in itself its merit and its reward. But, the Church spares no effort in revealing to us that fasting is but a means, one among many, towards a higher goal: the spiritual renewal of man, his return to God, true repentance and, therefore, true reconciliation. The Church spares no effort in warning us against a hypocritical and pharisaic fasting, against the reduction of religion to mere external obligations. As a Lenten hymn says:

In vain do you rejoice in no eating, O soul!
For you abstain from food,
But from passions you are not purified.
If you persevere in sin, you will perform a useless fast.
Now, forgiveness stands at the very center of Christian faith and of Christian life because Christianity itself is, above all, the religion of forgiveness. God forgives us, and His forgiveness is in Christ, His Son, Whom He sends to us, so that by sharing in His humanity we may share in His love and be truly reconciled with God. Indeed, Christianity has no other content but love. And it is primarily the renewal of that love, a return to it, a growth in it, that we seek in Great Lent, in fasting and prayer, in the entire spirit and the entire effort of that season. Thus, truly forgiveness is both the beginning of, and the proper condition for the Lenten season.


video

One may ask, however: Why should I perform this rite when I have no "enemies"? Why should I ask forgiveness from people who have done nothing to me, and whom I hardly know? To ask these questions, is to misunderstand the Orthodox teaching concerning forgiveness. It is true, that open enmity, personal hatred, real animosity may be absent from our life, though if we experience them, it may be easier for us to repent, for these feelings openly contradict Divine commandments. But, the Church reveals to us that there are much subtler ways of offending Divine Love. These are indifference, selfishness, lack of interest in other people, of any real concern for them -- in short, that wall which we usually erect around ourselves, thinking that by being "polite" and "friendly" we fulfill God’s commandments. The rite of forgiveness is so important precisely because it makes us realize – be it only for one minute – that our entire relationship to other men is wrong, makes us experience that encounter of one child of God with another, of one person created by God with another, makes us feel that mutual "recognition" which is so terribly lacking in our cold and dehumanized world.

On that unique evening, listening to the joyful Paschal hymns we are called to make a spiritual discovery: to taste of another mode of life and relationship with people, of life whose essence is love. We can discover that always and everywhere Christ, the Divine Love Himself, stands in the midst of us, transforming our mutual alienation into brotherhood. As l advance towards the other, as the other comes to me – we begin to realize that it is Christ Who brings us together by His love for both of us.

And because we make this discovery – and because this discovery is that of the Kingdom of God itself: the Kingdom of Peace and Love, of reconciliation with God and, in Him, with all that exists – we hear the hymns of that Feast, which once a year, "opens to us the doors of Paradise." We know why we shall fast and pray, what we shall seek during the long Lenten pilgrimage. Forgiveness Sunday: the day on which we acquire the power to make our fasting – true fasting; our effort – true effort; our reconciliation with God – true reconciliation.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


The following is by Archpriest Daniel Gurevic, pastor of St. Josaphat Ukrainian Catholic Church in Bethlehem, PA

There is no doubt for the majority of Catholics Lent today has become irrelevant. Most do not do extra prayer or fasting. The regulations of the Church have been notably reduced. Some Catholics, of course, observe the faith to the minimum. Church and religion have become Sunday morning events, and the rest of the week is devoted to secular pursuits. Some are only “ cultural” Catholics, who would answer that they are Catholic, if asked, but are not active in the Church at all. Others may be people of faith, but affected by the spirit of the times. We live in a consumer culture that does not support practices of self-denial or penance. The very concept of a “Lent,” of a period of repentance and humility before God, seems to belong to the past. They may say that penance is “old-fashioned,” and should be replaced by positive good works done to benefit others. The ancients, they may add, fasted only because they did not have access to the foods that we do, that is, they fasted only because they had to. On the other hand, many have rediscovered the value of the Great Fast, and it is probably observed more than in the materialistic period after World War II.

The historical reality is different than it seems on many points. It may be true that the origin of Lent was as a preparation for baptism, but the way of life that it taught to the learners - the “catechumens”-can be practiced by the faithful after initiation. Indeed, the faithful also prayed and fasted during Lent with the catechumens, to give them support, to witness to the value of self-denial and repentance, and to renew their own baptismal fervor. The initiation of new Christians was an exercise of the whole Church, and so Lent was practiced by the neophytes aspiring to become good Christians, and to the life of faith and wished to grow closer to their goal of deification. It is simply untrue that did not have access to the kinds of food we have now, and, in some ways, they were better off, though they didn’t understand all the principles of nutrition. They deliberately chose to fast and abstain from certain foods, a choice which has become very difficult in the kind of culture in which we live. The difficulty of observing Lent points out the real need for it.

In the Byzantine Liturgy, Lent is called the season of “Alleluia.” This is contrary to the practice of Western Liturgy, where the singing of “ Alleluia, “ a hymn of joy, is forbidden during Lent. In fact, the issue became a point of contention between the Churches during the Middle Ages. It was not the most serious issue, however, because the real differences were matters of the organization of the Churches and the underlying problems of ecclesiastical structures. East and West became antagonistic and intolerant and looked for issues to disagree upon. Today this practice is no longer a problem. In reality, both Churches are saying the same thing in different ways. Lent is a period of sobriety and penance, and our joy is muted and moderated. The Western Church expressed this in their ritual by suppressing the singing of Alleluia: the Eastern Churches expressed this same reality through the practice of kneeling, which they forbade during the fifty days from Pascha (Easter) to Pentecost.

There is a liturgical reason why Lent is called the period of ‘ Alleluia.” At the Office of Morning Praise, called Matins, the usual opening hymn, “God the Lord has revealed himself to us,” is replaced by the triple “ Alleluia.” The singing of “ Alleluia,” also replaces the Prokeimenon at Vespers in the lesser fasting periods ( The Apostles, Dormition and Phillips Fasts) and is sung solemnly at funerals. This might seem odd, as “Alleluia” has become almost exclusively a song of joy. Its original meaning, though, is simply “Praise the Lord,” “Allelu Yah”, in which “Yah” is the name of God revealed to Moses, “I am.” Because it uses God’s name, it is a very solemn hymn, one that the early Christians did not translate from the Hebrew. By its meaning, it does not denote joy exclusively, but praise and glorification of God in all situations. In death, therefore, we praise God who has given us the gift of life and also of death as the passage to eternal life. Even though there may be an element of sadness, God is still to be glorified in all his words, since they are all done out of love for us.

The same is true of Lent. Self - denial and mortification do not give us pleasure of happiness, but they do bring with them a spiritual joy. We can sing “ Alleluia” while repenting, because through this exercise, we are drawing nearer to our God, who is the source of all joy and happiness. St. Paul compared asceticism to a race, a physical struggle, adding, “Run so as to win.” (1 Cor 9:24)

When we are getting our bodies into condition, we have the famous slogan, “ No pain, no gain.” Physical fitness requires struggle and pain. Spiritual fitness is no different. To become spiritually healthy we need to do penance and practice self-denial, so that we can learn to love others and become less selfish. While there are many concerns in modern society over our physical fitness, we should be even more concerned over our spiritual fitness. Lent has never been more necessary. The analogy holds also in the joy that comes from physical fitness. After much training, we can win the race, so also, if we train our souls well, we can win the kingdom of God. For this reason, Lent, while being a tie of struggle with ourselves, is also a joyful journey that can be made with the singing of “Alleluia.”

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Metropolitan Volodymyr: To Seek to Obtain Autocephaly Now Is Difficult Dangerous and Not Necessary

SOURCE:  RISU

The Ukrainian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate) is not currently in need of autocephaly, even though the Church does not consider this subject banned from discussion. So said the Head of Ukrainian Orthodox Church-Moscow Patriarchate, Metropolitan Volodymyr in an іnterview to the newspaper Weekly Mirror ( №7, 24 February - 2 March).

“They talk a lot about possible autocephaly, but, officially, the question of the final decision was not raised. It does not mean that the Church prohibits to talk on this subject. The question of autocephaly is especially important for the Western Ukraine with its own history of the Church and Motherland. But one needs to understand that this will be accompanied with new problems, a number of problems connected with the structure of government and distribution of power,” said the hierarch.

The metropolitan stressed that the problem of autocephaly should be viewed “from the point of view of the Christian responsibility.” “The Church cannot be altered in the same way as we alter our secular institutions,”

“To seek to obtain autonomy now, in view of the present mixture in Ukraine, is difficult, dangerous and, in my opinion, is not necessary as of today,” said the Head of UOC-MP.

Saturday, February 25, 2012

South Africa: Over 1,000,000 (!) Abortions in 15 Years

SOURCE:  DICI (Documentation Information Catholiques Internationales)

Archbishop Buti Tlhagale, archbishop of Johannesburg and president of the South African Bishops’ Conference (SACBC), took up a firm position in a declaration published January 30, on the Bishops’ Conference website, in which he assesses the 15 years since abortion was legalized in South Africa.

“Since 1997, we count more than a million children who should have been born in South Africa, and who were deprived of the elementary right to live,” declared the Archbishop. “These children, if they had been born,” he insisted, “would be playing in the streets of the cities and towns of South Africa, singing and praying with us in our churches on Sunday.” “We are sad that these children of God were refused the right to be born in the world created by God and to enrich it with their own unique gifts and talents. We will never fully realize what we have lost because the law declares that abortion is acceptable,” continued Archbishop Tlhagale.

Recalling in season and out of season the Catholic Church’s “clear and unambiguous” position on abortion, the Archbishop of Johannesburg maintained that “every child born is created by God. He has a right to life. A right that must be respected by the mother and protected by the State.” Another right, he added, that must be respected by the State and its officials is that of “conscientious objection”: “Those who believe that abortion is morally reprehensible have the right to refuse to participate in procedures destined to provoke it.”

In conclusion, the Archbishop brought up the case of a young girl pregnant out of wedlock: “Every one of us, parents, teachers, members of the Church, must understand what happens to a young girl when she realizes she is pregnant. She needs our love, our support, our understanding, and sometimes our forgiveness.” And he recalled that she is welcome to come to the church to meet with a priest and have God’s grace restored to her. (sources: apic/sacbc – DICI#250, Feb17, 2012)

Former Anglicans celebrate Mass in St. Peter's, give thanks to Pope

SOURCE:  Written by Carol Glatz, Catholic News Service

VATICAN CITY - For perhaps the first time ever, Anglican hymns, chants and prayers reverberated off the marble walls of St. Peter's Basilica as some members of the world's first ordinariate for former Anglicans celebrated their coming into the Catholic Church.

"Wonderful is not a strong enough word to express how we feel to be here," where the apostle Peter gave his life "and where his successors guarded the faith for generations," said Father Len Black in his homily.

Mass at the basilica and the pilgrimage to Rome generated "a feeling of coming home," said the Catholic priest who served as an Episcopalian pastor in the Scottish Highlands for 31 years.

The group of about 94 pilgrims, including a dozen priests, was led by Msgr. Keith Newton, head of the Personal Ordinariate of Our Lady of Walsingham, which was established in January 2011 for former Anglicans in England and Wales.

After celebrating morning Mass Feb. 24 in a side chapel, the group moved to the center of the basilica and stood in front of the "Confessio" -- a lower chapel honoring St. Peter's confession of faith that led to his martyrdom -- and recited the General Thanksgiving, a traditional Anglican prayer.

"That was very moving, thanking God for all we received this year and for the pilgrimage," he told Catholic News Service.

The week-long Lenten pilgrimage highlighted the season's call to conversion but also was an opportunity to thank Pope Benedict XVI for establishing a structure for welcoming former Anglicans into the Catholic Church. Msgr. Newton, the ordinary, also met briefly with the Pope at the end of the Pope's general audience Feb. 22.

The Pope's 2009 apostolic constitution "Anglicanorum coetibus" provided a way for entire Anglican parishes or groups to become Catholic while retaining some of their Anglican heritage and liturgical practice.

"We felt this was the answer to our prayers" for corporate Christian unity, the monsignor said.

Ecumenical dialogue seems to no longer have full and visible corporate union as its goal, he said.

Dialogue has become more of an exercise in finding common ground and ways to cooperate, while the Anglican Communion falls further away from seeking revealed truth, Msgr. Newton said.

He said Blessed John Henry Newman saw himself engaged in a battle against liberalism, or rather, "that view that it didn't really matter what you believed, they were all equally important and that there was no such thing as revealed religion."

"And I think that's exactly what's happening in the Anglican community -- it's all personal opinions," he said.

"The problem of the ordination of women and gay marriage are symptoms of the problem -- the problem I think is liberalism in religion, secularism."

Msgr. Newton, who was an Anglican bishop, said the real underlying motive for him and many others to break with the Anglican Church was "because we believe in revealed truth" and obedience.

The creation of an ordinariate, which is similar to a diocese but national in scope, was a particularly Catholic way of building reciprocity between traditions in which each shares and contributes its own unique gifts with the other, he said.

"That seems to be exactly the way that ecumenism should go," he said. "It's the Holy Father's vision and we've got him to thank for it."

The ordinariate in England and Wales recently celebrated its one-year anniversary while the U.S. ordinariate was officially inaugurated in mid-February.

While the situation in predominately Anglican Great Britain is unique, Msgr. Newton said there are some lessons learned to pass on.

The biggest challenges have been practical issues, he said, such as determining where clergy, especially those who are married with families, will live; deciding how much priests will be paid; and finding a place and time to worship that's convenient for parishioners and clergy.

"One of the lessons we all learned is when you begin this process, you can't know exactly how it's going to work out for you as an individual; it really is a step of faith."

Michael Vian Clark, director of music at the Benedictine Buckfast Abbey in Devon, cobbled together "a scratch choir" out of the pilgrims who came from different parts of Great Britain.

People who didn't know each other were singing Roman-rite chants and Anglican hymns and psalms in harmony without much practice or preparation because "there's a 'have a go' attitude in the Anglican tradition, particularly with music," he said.

"Good music in the liturgy is a slice of heaven," Vian Clark said. "It's a glimpse to heaven and it allows people to realize that the liturgy and the Mass is a gift which is not of this world.

"It's something that raises all of our hearts and minds and send us out with a sense of true Christian joy, and I think the Holy Father understands that that's really important," he said.

Sheptytsky Institute Study Days 2012

Study Days – June 30 to July 2, 2012

February 22, 2012
 
Dear Friends of the Institute,
 
Please accept our warmest invitation to attend Sheptytsky Institute Study Days 2012 – An Eastern Christian Feast for the Mind and Heart – to be held from Saturday, June 30 to Monday, July 2, 2012 at Saint Paul University in Ottawa.   We will also be offering a Cantoring Workshop on Friday, June 29, 2012. As usual, two accredited courses (worth 3 credits each) will be offered from Wednesday, July 4 to Saturday, July 14.

 The theme this year is: The Bible – A Timeless Text for Today? “Celebrating … Understanding … Living … the Word of God.” The Bible is central to all of Christian life. And yet, reading it can bring as many questions as answers.  Our Study Days will begin with an introduction to the place of the Scriptures in the Church’s life, and move on to reflect on some “difficult passages.”  How are we to understand the Book of Revelation?  What is to be made of Old Testament texts where God appears vindictive?  These, and many more questions will be discussed in the context of Eastern Christianity’s distinctive approach to biblical interpretation.

We have confirmed three plenary speakers who will be presenting this theme from different viewpoints.  The plenary speakers are Dr. Edith Humphrey (Professor, Pittsburgh Theological Seminary and laywoman of the Antiochian Orthodox Church), Father Andrew Onuferko (holder of the Wynnyckyj Teaching and Research Fellowship at the Sheptytsky Institute in Saint Paul University and Ukrainian Catholic priest) and Father Andrea Spatafora (Dean of the Faculty of Theology at Saint Paul University and Roman Catholic priest).

 We turn to you to assist us in advertising Study Days by sharing this information.  A vital way of helping us is through your promotion of the conference as you speak to the people you know.  Most importantly, please pray that the participants realize a fruitful outcome to their spiritual and intellectual seeking.

More information on Study Days, the Cantoring Workshop and the Academic Courses will be forthcoming. In the meantime, please feel free to contact me at 613-236-1393, extension 2330.  You may also wish to visit our website at www.sheptytskyinstitute.ca

Thank you, in advance, for your good will, kindness and support. Hoping you accept our invitation, I am

Yours faithfully in Our Lord,

Father Stephen

RESOURCE: How the Church Books Work - Holy Transfiguration Monastery Publications

A new website of Holy Transfiguration Monastery (Brookline, MA) was conceived to explain and illustrate what the Church books are and how they are used. (Holy Transfiguration Monastery Publications)

It begins with The Liturgical Year Introduced, a series of diagrams that show when the Menaion, Triodion, Pentecostarion, and Octoëchos are used throughout the year, the difference between moveable and immovable feasts, and how they work together.

A GREAT resource for all.

Archbishop Ihor (UAOC) Comments on Situation in UOC

SOURCE:  RISU

If any parts of the divided Ukrainian Church unite in one structure today according to the existing principles, it would not create one local Church but it would create one problem. So stated Archbishop Ihor (Isichenko) of Kharkiv and Poltava of the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church, Professor of V. Karamzin Kharkiv National University on 23 February, within the framework of the Project “From the book to the goal” of Iryna Farion.

“Let us remember the experiments of President Kravchuk. The only way, defended today by us, Archbishop Makarii of Lviv of UAOC and me, from the time of death of Patriarch Dymytrii, is the way commanded by Patriarch Dymytrii himself, namely, to return to the canonical state of Church life, the state before 1686. This way has already been passed by our Churches in diaspora, the Churches in Canada and USA. Our challenge is not to avoid that way, but to join it and to restore the normal canonical life of all the Orthodox community of Ukraine under the umbrella of the Ecumenical Patriarch, and then, there will be no problems regarding the establishment of one jurisdiction,” noted Archbishop Ihor.

With respect to the present situation in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church-Moscow Patriarchate connected with the illness of Metropolitan Volodymyr, Archbishop Ihor stressed that we are witnesses of a kind of a putsch of the Moscow Patriarchate. “And when the Church of the Moscow Patriarchate realizes all the insidiousness of the political trap, where it is now, I think it will urge a part of this Church to look for ways out and ways to join UAOC or UOC-KP and then, the process, started by our Churches in diaspora, will take place,” said the hierarch.

He avoided a conversation about unification between UAOC and UOC-KP, reported ZIK.

Lenten Reflections: Observing Lent with our children

SOURCE:  OCA Website

When Lent arrives, parents have schedules to maneuver, menus to plan, and services to squeeze in on busy school nights. We take stock: when does Holy Week fall? Whose birthday will be trumped by Lent this year? How will we make it to the extra services when we are in the middle of Little League season?


The following collected words of wisdom from other Orthodox parents might help:

  • Don’t sweat the small stuff. Most parents find it’s better to resist the temptation to read labels while shopping in the store, or to try to monitor what the teens are choosing to eat when they aren’t at home. Let’s not set up standards of perfection that will quickly succumb to the practical realities of family life. The overall goal is that we, as parents and children, will cleanse our souls, simplify our lives, practice a greater degree of love and self-sacrifice, and prepare for the Feast of Pascha. Our own father confessors can best guide us as to how to do this without ruining the atmosphere in our homes with Lenten grumpiness.
  • Do create a Lent-friendly kitchen. We can keep our pantries free of dairy-heavy snacks and Beef Jerky. Our food buying will set the tone, as will our own eating choices when we are grabbing food on the go. Our fasting should be more rigorous than what we expect from our children, because what we do is more important than what we make them do. We can help them along by preparing tasty, simple meals that they enjoy.
  • Do put thought into managing the family calendar. Life doesn’t stop during Lent, but instead it relentlessly marches on with baseball playoff games, school plays, non-Orthodox family weddings, and western Easter gatherings. We have to decide at the beginning of each Lenten week what we’ll do as a family, and what we’ll forgo. As always, we’ll need to strive for the balance between attending so many events at church that our children grow weary, and skipping services out of sheer laziness.

Sister Magdalen reminds us in the SVS Press book, Children in the Church Today that being a wise parent “sometimes involves letting go temporarily of secondary aspects in order to concentrate on central things (faith, love, freedom, truth). We know that ‘secondary’ things contribute to the essentials, and we try to live in a way that makes this manifest, and to explain it to our young people. However, we may have to wait patiently while our children go through the experience of sorting out the central meaning of life for themselves.”

This good counsel extends to all of the Lenten disciplines. Let’s go forward into this journey with enthusiasm, knowing that in due season we will “reap, if we faint not.”

Here are some ideas for how we can observe Lent in our families:

  • Pick one service a week to go to, one that works with family obligations and schedules. Let your child pick his or her favorite service and then make attending it a special event by sharing a Lenten restaurant meal together afterwards. Kids love the one-on-one time, and we never know what our child will want to talk about after experiencing a Lenten service.
  • Find ways to include the kids in ministry tasks, whether that be baking holy bread, decorating the temple, or bringing food to a shut-in.
  • Talk about the meaning of Lent. After dinner, ask, why do we fast? Discuss the next Sunday’s theme.
  • Pick an alms project. The Orthodox Christian Mission Center supplies families with coin boxes for missions — have your kids empty their pocket change into the boxes at dinner.
  • Put up this helpful fridge poster: “My Lenten Journey,” which tracks the time and suggests one simple way to keep Lent each of the 40 days.
  • Read Orthodox kids books together, and listen to the music of the Church while traveling. A good book to read through during Lent is The Bible For Young People
  • Unplug your family — turn off the TV, unhook cable for 40 days, hide the X-box; instead, play table games, take walks, and read a good book out loud.

VIDEO: Priest Reveals What He Truly Thinks About The HHS Mandate

Fr. Leo Patalinghug You Tube Video addresses the HHS Mandate in a very distinct manner.

VIDEO: :Two Paths Diverged at the Wood" - EAD Youth Choir Concert Recording

On February 18-19, 2012, members of the Eastern American Diocesan Youth Choir gathered in Philadelphia to perform a spiritual concert: "Two Paths Diverged at the Wood," - a story of spiritual struggle, in Eastern Orthodox chant.

A video news report on on the concert can be found here http://youtu.be/P23joRTTd88

Concert video produced by the Media Office of the Eastern American Diocese of ROCOR www.eadiocese.org

VIDEO: "Пастырь - митрополит Киевский Владимир"

The life of Metropolitan Volodomyr, Part 1 & 2 (in Russian)



Friday, February 24, 2012

Seal of Metropolitan Volodymyr to Be Used Only With Consent of Metropolitan Ahafangel of Odesa

SOURCE:  RISU

 
Archbishop Mytrofan (Yurchuk), the administrator of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church-Moscow Patriarchate (UOC-MP), named the reason why the seal of the head of UOC, Metropolitan Volodymyr, is kept by Metropolitan Ahafanhel of Odesa, reported Religion in Ukraine.

In answer to the question about the legitimacy of approval of church documents by Metropolitan Ahafanhel, Bishop Mytrofan said that the seal is kept by Metropolitan Ahafanhel “in order to ensure that the seal is in safe hands and is not used for any other purposes.”
 
Metropolitan Ahafanhel
According to Archbishop Mytrofan, “the seal will be attached to documents when necessary with the consent of Metropolitan Ahafanhel.”

The archbishop did not bother to explain why the seal should be kept in Odesa and not in Kyiv and why it should be kept by Metropolitan Ahafanhel and not the head of the UOC-MP, the administrator of the UOC or the Primate’s secretary.

According to a report of religion.in.ua, the administrator of the office of the Kyivan Metropolitanate of the UOC, Archimandrite Arkadii (Demchenko), recently visited Metropolitan Ahafanhel in Odesa. However, he refused to give back the seal. The metropolitan explained that he accepted the seal of Metropolitan Volodymyr for storage at the session of the Synod and will return it at a session of the Synod.

But it is not known whether Metropolitan Ahafanhel intends to give the seal back at the next session. According to the report, the keeping of the seal by the Metropolitan of Odesa is not authorized by any church documents except the tacit agreement of the members of the Synod.

Thursday, February 23, 2012

Decision of Synod of UOC is Step to Liquidation of Its Independence

SOURCE:  RISU


Archbishop Yevstratii
Representatives of the Kyivan Patriarchate (UOC-KP) questioned the legitimacy of the Synod of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church-Moscow Patriarchate (UOC-MP) of 21 February which was held under the chairmanship of Metropolitan Ahafanhel of Odesa despite the written prohibition sent by Metropolitan Volodymyr to the Synod members on 17 February. According to them, the dismissal of Archbishop Oleksandr (Drabynko) is only the tip of the iceberg and can lead to the complete loss of independence of UOC from Moscow.

“It is about more fundamental things. Namely, the fulfillment of an old dream of Patriarch Kirill of Moscow to deprive UOC-MP of its independence and self-government,” wrote Archbishop Yevstratii (Zoria), the Secretary of the Synod of UOC-KP in an article What is happening in UOC-MP? “The Kremlin would like to exercise as much influence on UOC-MP as possible, including the possibility to use it against the state leadership of Ukraine if necessary,” he noted.

Representatives of UOC-KP are convinced that Patriarch Kirill himself, who seeks to rule the Ukrainian Church, is interested to strengthen his direct control over the life of UOC-MP. Archbishop Yevstratii stressed that a constructional defect was laid in the structure of UOC, which was bound to result in its destruction sooner or later. It is the fact that it was designed to have two steering wheels, the Moscow one and the Kyiv one. The letter was increasingly growing in significance under Metropolitan Volodymyr. He began to resist the Moscow schemes actively. However, the authority of Metropolitan Volodymyr did not allow Moscow to openly oppose him and, therefore, it chooses another way, “it strikes Metropolitan Volodymyr through the most vulnerable area, which is Archbishop Oleksandr. For they understand well that the Head of UOC-MP, who is seriously ill, is not able any more to hold or protect the steering wheel without the help of the young secretary.”
According to Archbishop Yevstratii, the main problem for Moscow is to remove the Kyiv steering wheel. The independence and self-government of UOC-MP is based on the fact that its leadership elects, appoints and rotates bishops independently. If these three functions are lost UOC-MP will lose the independent status and will be transformed into an exarchate of the Russian Church again.